Pakizegi v. First National

USCA1 Opinion









June 5, 1995
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________


No. 95-1161

YASAMIN PAKIZEGI,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF BOSTON,

Defendant, Appellee.


____________________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. Nathaniel M. Gorton, U.S. District Judge] ___________________

____________________

Before

Torruella, Chief Judge, ___________
Selya and Stahl, Circuit Judges. ______________

____________________

Yasamin Pakizegi on brief pro se. ________________
Robert B. Gordon, Richard P. Ward and Ropes & Gray on brief for ________________ ________________ ____________
appellee.


____________________


____________________




















Per Curiam. Appellant Yasamin Pakizegi appeals ___________

from the denial of her motion for relief from judgment filed

under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(3).

"[T]he treatment of a Rule 60(b) motion is

committed to the discretion of the district court and may be

reversed only upon a finding of an abuse of that discretion."

Ojeda-Toro v. Rivera-Mendez, 853 F.2d 25, 28 (1st Cir. 1988). __________ _____________

We find an abuse of discretion if we become convinced that

"the court below committed a clear error of judgment in the

conclusion it reached upon a weighing of all the relevant

factors." United States v. Boch Oldsmobile, Inc., 909 F.2d ______________ _____________________

657, 660 (1st Cir. 1990). Finally, our review is confined to

the denial of the Rule 60(b) motion; we do not treat the

merits of the underlying judgment. Ojeda-Toro, 853 F.2d at __________

28.

Rule 60(b)(3) allows relief from judgment for

"fraud (whether heretofore denominated intrinsic or

extrinsic), misrepresentation, or other misconduct of an

adverse party." Appellant alleges that appellee First

National Bank of Boston (the "Bank") made numerous

misrepresentations of fact in its motion for summary judgment

on appellant's claim that her employment at the Bank was

terminated based on her national origin (Iranian) in

violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42

U.S.C. 2000e et seq. To prevail on her Rule 60(b)(3) __ ____

















motion, appellant must show that these alleged

misrepresentations prevented her from "fully and fairly"

presenting her defense to the summary judgment motion. See ___

In re M/V Peacock, 809 F.2d 1403, 1404-05 (9th Cir. 1987). __________________

Misrepresentations can have this effect only when a party did

not have knowledge of the alleged inaccuracies or access to

information which could have resulted in this knowledge at

the time of the alleged misconduct. Ojeda-Toro, 853 F.2d at __________

29.

In support of her claim that the Bank made

misrepresentations of fact in the motion for summary

judgment, appellant points to the documents submitted by the

Bank in support of the motion and the documents she submitted

in opposition to the motion. Indeed, appellant specifically

states in her brief on appeal that she brought the alleged

misrepresentations to the attention of the district court

prior to its grant of summary judgment. ________

"Even where misrepresentations are made during a

litigation, it is not an abuse of discretion to deny relief

to the losing party under Rule 60(b)(3), where the party had

access to accurate information." 7 J. Moore & J. Lucas,

Moore's Federal Practice 60.24[5], at 90 (2d ed. Supp. _________________________

1994-95) (footnote omitted). Because appellant already had

presented her position to the district court, we cannot say

that the Bank's supposed misrepresentations prevented her



-3-













from fully presenting her case. See In re M/V Peacock, 809 ___ _________________

F.2d at 1405. Thus, the court did not abuse its discretion

in determining that appellant could not rely on the Bank's

alleged fraud as a reason for relief from judgment under Rule

60(b)(3). We therefore need not reach the question whether

appellant's Rule 60(b)(3) motion was filed within a

reasonable time.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed and ________

appellant's request for oral argument is denied. ______



































-4-