USCA1 Opinion
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
_________________________
No. 96-1490
JUAN A. BERDEC A-P REZ,
Plaintiff, Appellee,
v.
JOS ZAYAS-GREEN, ET AL.,
Defendants, Appellants.
_________________________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO
[Hon. Carmen Consuelo Cerezo, U.S. District Judge] ___________________
_________________________
Before
Selya, Circuit Judge, _____________
Bownes, Senior Circuit Judge, ____________________
and Stahl, Circuit Judge. _____________
_________________________
Jose R. Perez-Hernandez and Pierluisi & Mayol-Bianchi on _________________________ __________________________
brief for appellants.
Ramonita Dieppa-Gonz lez and Puerto Rico Legal Services, ________________________ _____________________________
Inc. on brief for appellee. ____
_________________________
April 16, 1997
_________________________
SELYA, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-appellee Juan A. SELYA, Circuit Judge. ______________
Berdec a-P rez, an accountant, has worked for the Municipality of
Barranquitas from 1978 to the present time. In the November 1992
elections, the New Progressive Party seized the reins of power in
the municipal government. Shortly thereafter, the plaintiff was
transferred to a different post (though his salary remained
intact). In early 1994, however, the plaintiff's salary was
slashed sharply. After unsuccessfully pursuing administrative
remedies, he invoked 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1994) and sued two top
municipal officials. He alleged, inter alia, that, although _____ ____
political affiliation was not a suitable criterion for the job
that he held, the defendants nonetheless cut his pay in
retaliation for his active support of the Popular Democratic
Party.
In due course, the defendants moved for brevis ______
disposition on the ground that they were at least qualifiedly
immune from the plaintiff's suit for damages. On February 26,
1996, the district court denied their motion in a cryptic,
single-sentence order. The defendants then prosecuted this
interlocutory appeal.
We need not tarry. To the extent that the appellants
claim that their actions are insulated from First Amendment
scrutiny as a matter of law because a reduction in the
plaintiff's salary was necessitated by the Uniform Compensation
Act, P.R. Laws Ann. tit. 3, 760 et seq. (1988 Supp.), the __ ____
regulations thereunder, and the personnel regulations of the
2
Municipality of Barranquitas, they are wrong and they are wrong
under federal law that was clearly established when they acted.
See, e.g., Rosario-Torres v. Hernandez-Colon, 889 F.2d 314, 318 ___ ____ ______________ _______________
(1st Cir. 1989) (en banc); Santiago-Negron v. Castro-Davila, 865 _______________ _____________
F.2d 431, 433-34 (1st Cir. 1989); Roure v. Hernandez Colon, 824 _____ ________________
F.2d 139, 141-43 (1st Cir. 1987) (per curiam). To the extent
that the appellants claim that their actions are insulated from
First Amendment scrutiny as a matter of fact because their only
intention was to obey the law, the record presents an issue of
fact as to their intent an issue of the type that can no longer
be resolved on interlocutory appeal. See Johnson v. Jones, 115 ___ _______ _____
S. Ct. 2151, 2156 (1995); Santiago-Mateo v. Cordero, ___ F.3d ______________ _______
___, ___ (1st Cir. 1997) [No. 96-1688, slip op. at 3-5]; Stella ______
v. Kelley, 63 F.3d 71, 75 (1st Cir. 1995). Either way, the ______
instant appeal is an exercise in futility.1
Appeal dismissed. Appeal dismissed. ________________
____________________
1The lack of specific findings by the lower court, while not
fatal to its ruling on summary judgment, see Domegan v. Fair, 859 ___ _______ ____
F.2d 1059, 1065-66 (1st Cir. 1988), complicates the appellate
task. Especially in light of the jurisdictional questions that
attend the denial of summary judgment motions raising qualified
immunity defenses, we urge the district courts, either by
rescripts or bench decisions, to give us some indication of their
reasoning.
3