in Re Patricia Ann Potts and Minor A.M.W. (A Child)

Abatement Order filed November 19, 2013. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-13-00993-CV IN RE PATRICIA ANN POTTS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF A.M.W., A CHILD, Relator ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 11th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2009-741611 ABATEMENT ORDER On November 8, 2013, relator Patricia Ann Potts, individually and as next friend of A.M.W., a child, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See 1 Relator was adjudged a vexatious litigant in Cause No. 2009-74161 by the Honorable Mike Miller, presiding judge of the 11th District Court of Harris County. Judge Miller’s judgment prohibits relator from filing, in propria persona, any new litigation in this state without the permission of a local administrative judge. This original proceeding stems from the denial of such permission in a new litigation for which a separate cause number has not been assigned. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 11.102(f). Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel respondent, the Honorable Ken Wise, local administrative judge of Harris County, to vacate his order dated October 10, 2013, denying her request as a vexatious litigant to file a litigation against Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. When relator filed her petition, respondent no longer held public office as the local administrative judge of Harris County. By rule, we must abate this original proceeding to permit respondent’s successor to reconsider the decision regarding relator’s request. See Tex. R. App. P. 7.2(b); see also In re Baylor Med. Ctr. at Garland, 280 S.W.3d 227, 227 (Tex. 2008) (orig. proceeding) (“Mandamus will not issue against a new judge for what a former one did.”). Therefore, we order this original proceeding abated until December 19, 2013, at which time the new administrative judge of Harris County shall advise this court of the action taken on relator’s request. This court will then consider a motion to reinstate or dismiss this original proceeding, as appropriate. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Donovan, and Brown. 2