United States v. Lara-Unzueta, Miguel

UNPUBLISHED ORDER Not to be cited per Circuit Rule 53 United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 December 22, 2005 Before Hon. JOHN L. COFFEY, Circuit Judge Hon. DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge Hon. DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge No. 04-1954 Appeal from the United States UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, District Court for the Northern Plaintiff-Appellee, District of Illinois, Eastern Division v. No. 02 CR 995 MIGUEL LARA-UNZUETA, Charles R. Norgle, Sr., Defendant-Appellant. Judge. ORDER Miguel Lara-Unzueta challenged his sentence of 65 months’ imprisonment, contending the district court committed plain error under United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), by applying the sentencing guidelines as mandatory. We ordered a limited remand under United States v. Paladino, 401 F.3d 471, 483-84 (7th Cir. 2005), to determine whether Booker’s added discretion would have benefitted Lara. The district court has responded that it would have imposed the same sentence. Lara, therefore, cannot show plain error. See id. at 484. We invited the parties to address the appropriate disposition of this appeal in light of the district court’s response, but Lara has let the deadline pass without taking that opportunity. His sentence is within the 63- to 78-month guideline range and is therefore presumed reasonable. United States v. Mykytiuk, 415 F.3d 606-608 (7th Cir. 2005). Nothing in the record leads us to question that presumption. Accordingly, the judgment is AFFIRMED.