United States v. Luis Lira

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 03-3934 ___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the District Luis Lira, also known as Luis Joel * of Minnesota. Lira-Lopez, also known as Joel Lira- * Lopez, also known as David Machuka- * [UNPUBLISHED] Hernandez, also known as Manuel * Machuka-Perez, * * Appellant. * ___________ Submitted: August 26, 2004 Filed: August 31, 2004 ___________ Before SMITH, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Luis Lira appeals the sentence the district court* imposed after Lira pleaded guilty to possessing cocaine with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B) and 18 U.S.C. § 2, and illegally reentering the United States * The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Lira’s counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing the court should have sentenced Lira below the statutory minimum. We conclude the district court committed no error in not departing below the statutory minimum sentence, because the government had not filed a substantial- assistance motion and Lira did not qualify for safety-valve relief. See 18 U.S.C. § 3553(e); U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2(a)(1); United States v. Chacon, 330 F.3d 1065, 1066 (8th Cir. 2003). Having conducted an independent review under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), and finding no nonfrivolous issues, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We also grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. ______________________________ -2-