FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION MAR 26 2010
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CARMON E. WARREN, No. 07-16463
Petitioner - Appellant, D.C. No. CV-06-01328-OWW
v.
MEMORANDUM *
DARRELL G. ADAMS, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of California
Oliver W. Wanger, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 16, 2010 **
Before: SCHROEDER, PREGERSON, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
California state prisoner Carmon E. Warren appeals pro se from the district
court’s judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition challenging a
prison disciplinary proceeding. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253,
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
AK/Research
and we affirm.
Warren contends that the district court erred by dismissing his petition for
lack of jurisdiction. This contention lacks merit because Warren has not
demonstrated that the reversal of his disciplinary conviction is likely to accelerate
his release from prison. See Ramirez v. Galaza, 334 F.3d 850, 859 (9th Cir. 2003).
AFFIRMED.
AK/Research 2 07-16463