Hepting v. At&t Corportation

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT TASH HEPTING, on Behalf of  Himself and All Others Similarly Situated; GREGORY HICKS; ERIK KNUTZEN, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated; CAROLYN JEWEL, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated; BENSON B. ROE, Plaintiff in related case no. C-06-03467 MMC, Plaintiffs-Appellees, No. 06-17132 and  D.C. No. WIRED NEWS; CONDENET INC., CV-06-00672-VRW Intervenors, v. AT&T CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant, and AT&T, INC., Defendant, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Intervenor.  14985 14986 HEPTING v. AT&T CORP. TASH HEPTING, on Behalf of  Himself and All Others Similarly Situated; GREGORY HICKS; ERIK KNUTZEN, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated; CAROLYN JEWEL, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated; BENSON B. ROE, Plaintiff in related case no. No. 06-17137 C-06-03467 MMC, Plaintiffs-Appellees,  D.C. No. CV-06-00672-VRW v. AT&T CORPORATION; AT&T, INC., Defendants, and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Intervenor- Appellant.  AL-HARAMAIN ISLAMIC FOUNDATION,  INC., an Oregon Nonprofit No. 06-36083 Corporation; WENDELL BELEW, a D.C. Nos. U.S. Citizen and Attorney at Law; MDL-CV-06-1791- ASIM GHAFOOR, a U.S. Citizen and VRW Attorney at Law, Plaintiffs-Appellees,  CV-07-00109-VRW Northern District v. of California, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the San Francisco United States, et al., ORDER Defendants-Appellants.  HEPTING v. AT&T CORP. 14987 Filed November 16, 2007 Before: Harry Pregerson, Michael Daly Hawkins, and M. Margaret McKeown, Circuit Judges. ORDER On April 26, 2007, Al-Haramain v. Bush, No. 06-36083, was consolidated with Hepting v. AT&T Corp., Nos. 06- 17132, 06-17137. The Clerk shall sever Al-Haramain v. Bush, No. 06-36083, from Hepting v. AT&T Corp., Nos. 06-17132, 06-17137, and the cases shall no longer be consolidated for any purpose. PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2007 Thomson/West.