FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT TASH HEPTING, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated; GREGORY HICKS; ERIK KNUTZEN, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated; CAROLYN JEWEL on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated; BENSON B. ROE, Plaintiff in related case no. C-06-03467 MMC, Plaintiffs-Appellees, No. 06-17132 and D.C. No. CV-06-00672-VRW WIRED NEWS; CONDENET INC., Intervenors, v. AT&T CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant, and AT&T, INC., Defendant, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Intervenor. 11353 11354 HEPTING v. AT&T CORPORATION TASH HEPTING, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated; GREGORY HICKS, ERIK KNUTZEN, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated; CAROLYN JEWEL, on Behalf of No. 06-17137 Herself and All Others Similarly Situated; BENSON B. ROE, Plaintiff D.C. No. CV-06-00672-VRW in related case no. C-06-03467 MMC, Northern District of Plaintiffs-Appellees, California, San Francisco v. ORDER AT&T CORPORATION; AT&T, INC., Defendants, and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant. Filed August 21, 2008 Before: Harry Pregerson, Michael Daly Hawkins, and M. Margaret McKeown, Circuit Judges. ORDER In light of the FISA Amendments Act of 2008, Pub. L. No. 110-261, we remand this case to the district court. We retain jurisdiction over any further appeals. PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2008 Thomson Reuters/West.