Chad Brown v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida, Inc.

[DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 11-14013 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar FEB 6, 2012 ________________________ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 9:11-cv-80390-DMM CHAD BROWN, ERIC LOWE, T. ZENON PHARMACEUTICALS LLC, d.b.a. Pharmacy Matters, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF FLORIDA, INC. Defendant-Appellant. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida ________________________ (February 6, 2012) Before TJOFLAT, PRYOR and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: The district court, in a comprehensive order dated August 8, 2011, granted appellee’s motion to stay this action under the Colorado River1 doctrine pending the final disposition of an action in an Iowa state court in which appellant Pharmacy Matters, a mail-order pharmacy, is seeking payment for blood factors it provided appellants Brown and Lowe—the same payment it seeks to recover in this lawsuit. Appellants appeal the stay order, arguing that the district court abused its discretion in granting the stay; that is, it applied the Colorado River factors erroneously and the facts it found with respect to those factors are clearly erroneous. We disagree. The August 8 order demonstrates that the district court correctly applied the Colorado River factors and that the findings of fact it made with respect to the factors is supported by the record. Hence, granting the stay did not constitute an abuse of discretion. AFFIRMED. 1 See Colorado River Water Conservation Dist. v. United States, 424 U.S. 800, 96 S.Ct. 1236, 47 L. Ed.2d 483 (1976). 2