Rates Technology, Inc. v. Mediatrix Telecom, Inc.

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. Giniteh étatefi Qtnurt of Qppeals fur the jfeheral @irmit RATES TECHNOLOGY, INC., Plaintiff, ‘ AND JAMES B. HICKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, V. MEDIATRIX TELECOM, INC. AND MEDIA5 CORPORATION, ' Defendants-Appellees, AND BURKE, WILLIAMS & SORENSEN, LLP, Defendant. 2011-1384 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York in case no. O5-CV-2755, Judge Joanna Seybert. ON MOTION ORDER RATES TECH V. MEDIATRIX TELECOM 2 James B. Hicks moves for a 60-day extension of time, until January 20, 2012, to file his reply brief. Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. FOR THE COURT DEC 03 2”“ Isl Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk cc: James B. Hicks, Esq. Ethan Horwitz, Esq. s21 FILED 8.3. 0 OF APPEALS FOR THE FE ERAt CIRCUIT DEC 082011 JAN HDRBALY CLERK