Vacate and Render, and Opinion Filed July 8, 2014.
S In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-12-01333-CV
ROUGH CREEK MANAGEMENT, L.L.C.,
CARY PLATT, AND PAUL BOCCAFOGLI, Appellants
V.
DONNA WEISS, INDIVIDUALLY, AND
AS NEXT FRIEND OF JORDAN WEISS, A MINOR CHILD, Appellee
On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DC-09-05554
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Bridges, Lang, and Evans
Opinion by Justice Lang
Before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to vacate and render judgment pursuant to
settlement. In their motion, the parties state, “all matters in controversy in this appeal have been
amicably compromised and settled.” The parties request that the Court “[(1)] vacate the [trial
court’s] judgment from which this appeal is taken, without regard to [the] merits, and [(2)] []
render judgment dismissing the cause with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs, on
the ground that all matters in controversy in this appeal have been amicably compromised and
settled.” Further, the parties advise, “[they] do not seek dismissal of this appeal, but instead seek
vacatur of the trial court’s judgment and rendition of judgment dismissing the cause.”
Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1 addresses voluntary dismissal in civil cases.
TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1. A voluntary dismissal may be by motion of the appellant or by agreement.
TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). “In accordance with an agreement signed by the parties or their
attorneys and filed with the clerk, the [appellate] court may [] render judgment effectuating the
parties’ agreements.” TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A). In the alternative, the appellate court may
“set aside the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits and remand the case to the trial
court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the agreements.” TEX. R. APP. P.
42.1(a)(2)(B).
As requested by the parties, the Court grants the parties’ motion and renders judgment
“vacat[ing] the [trial court’s] judgment from which this appeal is taken, without regard to [the]
merits,” and “dismissing the cause [and this appeal] with prejudice, with each party [] bear[ing]
its own costs.” TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A).
/Douglas S. Lang/
121333F.P05 DOUGLAS S. LANG
JUSTICE
–2–
S
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT
ROUGH CREEK MANAGEMENT, L.L.C., On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District
CARY PLATT, AND PAUL Court, Dallas County, Texas
BOCCAFOGLI, Appellants Trial Court Cause No. DC-09-05554.
Opinion delivered by Justice Lang. Justices
No. 05-12-01333-CV V. Bridges and Evans participating.
DONNA WEISS, INDIVIDUALLY, AND
AS NEXT FRIEND OF JORDAN WEISS,
A MINOR CHILD, Appellee
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is
VACATED without regard to the merits and judgment is RENDERED:
dismissing the cause and this appeal with prejudice, with each party bearing its
own costs.
It is ORDERED that each party bear its own costs of this appeal.
Judgment entered this 8th day of July, 2014.
–3–