In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
____________________
NO. 09-13-00095-CV
____________________
IN RE JOHN S. MORGAN AND JOHN S. MORGAN, P.C.
D/B/A MORGAN LAW FIRM
_______________________________________________________ ______________
Original Proceeding
________________________________________________________ _____________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
John S. Morgan and John S. Morgan, P.C. d/b/a Morgan Law Firm filed a petition
for writ of mandamus in which they seek to compel the trial court to vacate its venue
ruling and permit full venue discovery, to vacate its orders quashing venue discovery and
permit relators to depose venue fact witnesses, and to conduct a hearing on relators’
motion to disqualify opposing counsel. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.1. After reviewing the
petition and mandamus record, we conclude that the relators have not shown that the trial
court committed a clear abuse of discretion for which the relators lack an adequate
1
remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
PETITION DENIED.
PER CURIAM
Opinion Delivered March 14, 2013
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
2