Opinion filed August 30, 2013
In The
Eleventh Court of Appeals
__________
No. 11-11-00272-CR
__________
KENNETH LASHAWN GREEN, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 385th District Court
Midland County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. CR35821
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Kenneth Lashawn Green, Appellant, originally pleaded guilty to the offense
of aggravated assault/family violence with a deadly weapon. The trial court
deferred the adjudication of Appellant’s guilt and placed him on community
supervision for seven years. The trial court subsequently revoked Appellant’s
community supervision, adjudicated his guilt, assessed his punishment at
confinement for twenty years, and ordered that the sentence in this case shall run
consecutively to the sentences assessed in Counts I and II of cause no. CR38038 in
the 142nd District Court of Midland County. 1 We affirm.
In his sole issue on appeal, Appellant contends that the punishment assessed
by the trial court was improperly rendered and was excessive. Appellant’s
argument focuses only on the “harsh sentence” imposed by the trial court and the
stacking of the 20-year sentence in this case onto the two 4-year sentences for
sexual assault in cause no. CR38038. He contends that the trial court failed to
consider the wishes of the victim in the sexual assaults that Appellant not “go away
forever.” The trial court was not required to follow the wishes of that victim.
Appellant does not argue that his sentence in this case was disproportional to his
crime.
The offense for which Appellant was convicted in this case, aggravated
assault/family violence, was a first-degree felony and was therefore punishable by
a term of confinement for life or for a term of not less than five years or more than
ninety-nine years. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. §§ 12.32, 22.02(b)(1) (West 2011).
The trial court imposed a 20-year sentence, which is well within the range of
punishment for a first-degree felony. A sentence that falls within the range of
punishment authorized by statute is generally not cruel, unusual, or excessive.
Jackson v. State, 680 S.W.2d 809, 814 (Tex. Crim. App. 1984). We hold that the
trial court acted within its discretion when it assessed Appellant’s punishment and
ordered his sentence to run consecutively to those imposed in cause no. CR38038.
See Morrison v. State, No. 11-11-00191-CR, 2013 WL 2407088 (Tex. App.—
Eastland May 30, 2013, no pet. h.) (mem. op., not designated for publication).
Appellant’s sole issue on appeal is overruled.
1
On this same day in a companion case, Kenneth Lashon Green v. State, No. 11-11-00273-CR, we have
affirmed the judgments in which Appellant was convicted of two counts of sexual assault in trial court cause no.
CR38038.
2
We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
JIM R. WRIGHT
CHIEF JUSTICE
August 30, 2013
Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,
McCall, J., and Willson, J.
3