FILE COPY
COURT OF APPEALS
SANDEE BRYAN FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT KEITH E. HOTTLE
MARION CADENA-REEVES JUSTICE CENTER CLERK OF COURT
CHIEF JUSTICE 300 DOLOROSA, SUITE 3200
KAREN ANGELINI SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78205-3037
MARIALYN BARNARD WWW.TXCOURTS.GOV/4THCOA.ASPX TELEPHONE
REBECA C. MARTINEZ (210) 335-2635
PATRICIA O. ALVAREZ
LUZ ELENA D. CHAPA FACSIMILE NO.
JASON PULLIAM (210) 335-2762
JUSTICES
Thursday, February 26, 2015
Fred Hernandez Stephen Foster
Val Verde County Assistant District 310 S. St. Mary's
Attorney Suite 2400
P.O. Box 1405 San Antonio, TX 78205
Del Rio, TX 78841 * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
RE: Court of Appeals Number: 04-14-00671-CR
Trial Court Case Number: 11297CR
Style: The State of Texas
v.
Raul Becerra Castorena
Enclosed please find the order which the Honorable Court of Appeals has
issued in reference to the above styled and numbered cause.
If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Very truly yours,
KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK
_______________________
Carmen De Leon
Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53262
cc: Patricia Phelps
John Price (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)
The Honorable Enrique Fernandez
Gene Steele (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)
Luz Clara Balderas (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)
FILE COPY
The State of TexasAppellant Raul Becerra
Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas
Thursday, February 26, 2015
No. 04-14-00671-CR
The State of Texas,
Appellant
v.
Raul Becerra Castorena,
Appellee
From the 63rd Judicial District Court, Val Verde County, Texas
Trial Court No. 11297CR
The Honorable Enrique Fernandez, Judge Presiding
ORDER
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
Jason Pulliam, Justice
The State of Texas appeals the trial court’s September 3, 2014, order granting Raul
Becerra Castorena’s motion to quash the indictment. That order resulted from a hearing held in
the trial court on July 26, 2012. The official reporter notified this court that he was away from
the court on the day of the hearing on the motion to quash and that he had been unable to
ascertain whether a record was made of the proceedings. When the trial court and the court
reporter were unable to identify and locate the reporter who may have taken the record, we
abated the appeal for the trial court to conduct a hearing and make fact findings.
In accordance with our order, the trial court held hearings on January 29, 2015 and
February 12, 2015, and made written findings. The court’s findings and reporter’s records of the
hearings have been filed in a supplemental record. The court’s findings are attached to this
order. We reinstate this appeal on the docket of this court and adopt the trial court’s findings.
Record of the July 26, 2012 hearing
We conclude that the record of the July 26, 2012, hearing, if one was taken, has been lost
or destroyed and cannot be replaced. However, the State was required to request the record in
writing at or before the time for perfecting the appeal and file a copy of the request with the trial
FILE COPY
court clerk. TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(b)(1), (2). The deadline for perfecting the appeal in this case
was September 23, 2014. The trial court found that no written request for the reporter’s record
was made, and no request appears in the clerk’s record or on the docket sheet. The trial court
was unable to determine when the State’s informal request for the record was made, other than
that the request was made on or before December 8, 2014.
This appeal will proceed without a record of the July 26, 2012, hearing unless the State
files a response by March 9, 2015 (1) establishing that it timely requested the record be prepared
and (2) explaining why the record of the July 26, 2012, non-evidentiary hearing is necessary to
the resolution of the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(f)(1), (3).
Record of the March 2011 trial
During the abatement, the State made the court reporter and trial court aware that it is
also requesting a complete record of the March 2011 jury trial that resulted in a mistrial. The
court noted that the court reporters have begun preparing the record. We order court reporters
John Price and Gene Steele to file the reporter’s record of the March 2011 trial by March 30,
2015. If agreed or substitute copies of State’s Exhibit 2 and Defendant’s Exhibit 3 have not been
provided to the reporters by the time the record is due, the record should be filed with
placeholders indicating those exhibits are missing.
State’s Exhibit 2 and Defendant’s Exhibit 3 from the March 2011 trial
The trial court found that Defendant’s Exhibit 3 is lost and that State’s Exhibit 2 may be
lost. We order the parties to cooperate in attempting to reach an agreement as to replacement
copies of these exhibits and to deliver the agreed replacements to the court reporter.
We order the State to file a report, no later than March 19, 2015, both with this court
and the trial court, either stating that the exhibits have been replaced by agreement or setting
forth the reasons no agreement could be reached and the nature of any disagreements about the
accuracy of any proposed replacement.
If the exhibits are not replaced by agreement of the parties, the trial court shall make
findings, with or without a hearing at the trial court’s discretion, as to whether either exhibit can
be replaced “with a copy determined by the trial court to accurately duplicate with reasonable
certainty the original exhibit.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(f)(4). If the exhibits can be replaced, they
should be delivered to the court reporter for inclusion in the record. Any findings made by the
trial court pursuant to this order should be filed with this court in a supplemental record by
March 30, 2015.
_________________________________
Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 26th day of February, 2015.
___________________________________
Keith E. Hottle
Clerk of Court