Gerald Dewayne Butler v. State

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                         In The

                                                Court of Appeals

                        Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

 

                                                ______________________________

 

                                                             No. 06-09-00156-CR

                                                ______________________________

 

 

                              GERALD DEWAYNE BUTLER, Appellant

 

                                                                V.

 

                                     THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

 

 

                                                                                                  

 

 

                                       On Appeal from the 188th Judicial District Court

                                                             Gregg County, Texas

                                                          Trial Court No. 36304-A

 

                                                                                                   

 

 

 

                                          Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

                                            Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley


                                                     MEMORANDUM  OPINION

 

            Gerald DeWayne Butler was convicted of aggravated robbery in four separate prosecutions, for multiple robberies of different victims, occurring on three different dates.  Those convictions are all presently before this Court on appeal.  A fifth robbery involving a shooting was prosecuted earlier, and that conviction was appealed to this Court.  (All five robberies occurred during the span of six weeks.)  Our opinion affirming the conviction on the fifth robbery issued on November 12, 2009.[1]  By agreement with the State and the trial judge, issues that were litigated in the first prosecution concerning a pretrial motion to suppress could also be brought forward as issues in his four current appeals. 

            In this case, Butler appeals from his conviction on his plea of guilty pursuant to a plea bargain agreement that granted him the right of appeal from pretrial hearings.  He was convicted of aggravated robbery, with a deadly weapon finding, and sentenced to twenty years’ imprisonment, to run consecutively with his other convictions. 

            Butler raises three points on appeal wherein he alleges:  (1) the court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence; (2) the court erred by not suppressing his confession based on the violation of his right to exculpatory evidence under Brady[2]; and (3) the court erred by not suppressing his confession on constitutional grounds because he was not advised that he was being recorded. 

            Because the issues raised in each appeal, and the facts underlying each appeal are identical, for the reasons stated in our opinion dated this day in Butler v. State, cause number 06-09-00150-CR, we likewise in this appeal affirm the judgment of the trial court.

 

 

 

                                                                        Bailey C. Moseley

                                                                        Justice

 

Date Submitted:          July 6, 2010

Date Decided:             July 20, 2010

 

Do Not Publish



[1]Butler v. State, 300 S.W.3d 474 (Tex. App.––Texarkana 2009, pet. ref’d, untimely filed).

 

[2]Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963).