Order entered July 10, 2013
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-12-01079-CR
No. 05-12-01080-CR
KEITH BRONSHA PAUL, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause Nos. F11-41122-Y, F10-42448-Y
ORDER
The Court REINSTATES the appeals.
On April 18, 2013, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding whether
appellant filed a motion to suppress that encompassed both cases, whether the trial court made
findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding the motion for both cases, and whether a
hearing was conducted on the basis of a written motion in either case. We ADOPT the trial
court’s findings that: (1) on July 19, 2012, a suppression hearing was conducted on the basis of a
written motion to suppress in both trial court numbers F11-41122 and F10-42448; (2) the written
motion was referenced during the suppression hearing as well as during appellant’s guilty plea
hearing; (3) the written motion to suppress was filed with the district court clerk on April 10,
2013; (4) during the guilty plea hearing in both cases, the trial court explained to appellant that
he could appeal the motion to suppress in both cases; (5) the original findings of fact filed on
July 19, 2012 erroneously omitted trial court number F10-42448; (6) on April 10, 2013, the trial
court issued amended written findings of fact and conclusions of law that include both trial court
numbers; and (7) the trial court made an docket entry on April l9, 2013 stating its original intent
to include both case numbers on the motion to suppress hearing held on July 19, 2012.
Included in the supplemental clerk’s record in each case is appellant’s motion to suppress
and the trial court’s amended findings of fact and conclusions of law. Additionally, on June 9,
2013, we received the reporter’s record of the July 19, 2012 suppression hearing.
We ORDER appellant to file his brief within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to
counsel for each party.
/s/ DAVID EVANS
JUSTICE