Ronald L. Jones v. Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Fort Worth

02-13-035-CV


COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

 

 

 

NO. 02-13-00035-CV

 

 

Ronald L. Jones

 

v.

 

 

Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Fort Worth

§

 

§

 

§

 

§

 

 

From County Court at Law No. 1

 

of Tarrant County (2012-005505-1)

 

February 28, 2013

 

Per Curiam

 

 

JUDGMENT

 

          This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the appeal should be dismissed.  It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

 

 

 

PER CURIAM

 

 

 

 

 

 


COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

 

 

 

NO. 02-13-00035-CV

 

 

Ronald L. Jones

 

APPELLANT

 

V.

 

Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Fort Worth

 

APPELLEE

 

 

----------

FROM County Court at Law No. 1 OF Tarrant COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION[1]

----------

Ronald L. Jones is attempting to appeal the trial court’s order dismissing with prejudice all of his health care liability claims against Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Fort Worth.  On January 30, 2013, we notified Jones of our concern that we lack jurisdiction over the appeal because the trial court’s order does not appear to be final or an appealable interlocutory order.  Jones responded, but his response does not show grounds for continuing the appeal.

The trial court’s dismissal order does not dispose of Jones’s claims against Dr. Elliott Ray Trotter, and the trial court has not severed those claims.  When, as here, there has not been a conventional trial on the merits, an order or judgment is not final for purposes of appeal unless it actually disposes of every pending claim and party or clearly and unequivocally states that it finally disposes of all claims and parties.  Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 205 (Tex. 2001).  We have jurisdiction of appeals only from final orders or interlocutory orders made appealable by statute; this appeal is from neither.  See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014 (West Supp. 2012); Ogletree v. Matthews, 262 S.W.3d 316, 319 n.1 (Tex. 2007).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).

 

 

PER CURIAM

 

PANEL:  LIVINGSTON, C.J.; DAUPHINOT and GARDNER, JJ.

 

DELIVERED:  February 28, 2013



[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.