in Re: Craig Watkins

DISMISS and Opinion Filed April 2, 2013. F In The tniirt of Appeah *If1l iiioIrict of Jexaø at Ia11aø No, 05-l3-0029-CV No. 05-13-00299-CV No. 05-134J0300-CV No. 05-13-00301-CV No. 05-13-00302-CV IN RE CRAIG WATKINS, Relator On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F11-00180-Q, F11-00181-Q, F11-00182-Q, F11-00183-Q, and F11-00191-Q MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices O’Neill, Lagard&, and Richter 2 Opinion by Justice ONeill The Court has before it relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. Relator’s petition seeks to prevent the trial court from requiring relator to testify at an evidentiary hearing regarding the indictments of real party in interest. The hearing in question took place on March 7, 2013. The trial court ultimately quashed and dismissed all the indictments against real party in interest. The Hon. Sue Lagarde, Justice, Assigned 2 The Hon. Martin Richter, Justice, Assigned Accordingly’ we cannot provide relator with the relief he seeks, and we DISMISS this petition as moot. See Dow Chea Co. v. Garcia. 909 S.W.Zd 503, 505 (Tea. 1995) (orig. proceeding). 130298P205 -2-