In Re: Discipline of Lawrence Semenza

In re Discipline of Lerner, 124 Nev. 1232, 1246, 197 P.3d 1067, 1077 (2008) (explaining that in determining the appropriate discipline, four factors must be weighed: "the duty violated, the lawyer's mental state, the potential or actual injury caused by the lawyer's misconduct, and the existence of aggravating or mitigating factors"). Based on our review of the record, we conclude that the agreed-upon discipline is sufficient in relation to Semenza's admitted conduct. See State Bar of Nev. v. Claiborne, 104 Nev. 115, 213, 756 P.2d 464, 527 28 (1988) (explaining that the purpose of attorney discipline is to - protect the public, the courts, and the legal profession, not to punish the attorney). In particular, although his conviction was for a "serious offense," see SCR 111(6), the offense did not involve elements such as intentional interference with the administration of justice, false swearing, misrepresentation, or fraud that would warrant a more severe sanction or longer suspension. See generally ABA Standards for Imposing Lawyer Sanctions, Compendium of Professional Responsibility Rules and Standards, Standards 5.11 and 5.12 (2015 ed.). We therefore conclude that the guilty plea agreement should be approved. See SCR 113(1). We hereby impose a one year suspension retroactive to March 27, 2015. 1 Additionally, Semenza shall pay the costs of the disciplinary proceedings, excluding bar counsel and staff salaries, within 30 days of receipt of the 1 Due to the length of the suspension, Semenza will be required to petition for reinstatement pursuant to SCR 116. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A e State Bar's bill of costs. See SCR 120. The parties shall comply with SCR 115 and SCR 121.1. It is so ORDERED. Atirt gLAIM Hardesty C.J. Parraguirre J. J. J. Gibbons SAITTA, J., dissenting: Taking into consideration the nature of the criminal conduct, and the aggravating and mitigating factors, I am not satisfied that a one- year suspension retroactive to the date of the temporary suspension is sufficient to protect the public. I therefore dissent as I would reject the conditional guilty plea agreement. J. Saitta cc: Chair, Southern Nevada Disciplinary Board Wright Stanish & Winckler Lawrence J. Semenza, II Stan Hunterton, Bar Counsel, State Bar of Nevada Kimberly Farmer, Executive Director, State Bar of Nevada Perry Thompson, U.S. Supreme Court Admissions Office SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 3 (0) 1947A crgir90