IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
IN THE MATTER OF DISCIPLINE OF No. 69152
D. BRIAN BOGGESS, BAR NO. 4537.
FILED
JAN 2 2 2016
T K INDE
le
BY is tat"
DE
ORDER APPROVING CONDITIONAL GUILTY PLEA AGRE ENT
This is an automatic review of a Southern Nevada
Disciplinary Board hearing panel's recommendation that this court
approve, pursuant to SCR 113, a conditional guilty plea agreement in
exchange for a stated form of discipline for attorney D. Brian Boggess.
Under the agreement, Boggess admitted to multiple violations of RPC 1.3
(diligence), RPC 1.15 (safekeeping property), and RPC 8.4 (misconduct).
Boggess was admitted to practice law in Nevada in 1992. As
the result of bookkeeping errors starting in 2009, the balance in Boggess'
trust account repeatedly fell below the amount that should have been in
the account on behalf of multiple clients. During the relevant time,
Boggess was not reviewing his trust account statements. When he learned
of the errors, he obtained a personal loan in the amount of $75,000 and
deposited the money into his trust account. Additionally, during the same
time period, three clients complained to the State Bar that Boggess failed
to diligently pursue the matters for which he had been retained. The plea
agreement and information provided to the hearing panel indicate that no
clients suffered financial loss or other injury.
Under the plea agreement, Boggess agreed to a 24-month
suspension with all but 3-months stayed, provided that he successfully
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
(D) I947A e 1 - DZSZ
completes a two-year probationary period. He further agreed to the
following conditions during the probationary period: (1) he must perform
and pay for an audit of his trust accounts for the two-year period
immediately preceding the entry of his conditional guilty plea and present
the results of that audit to the State Bar; (2) if the audit reveals that any
individuals have suffered a financial loss, he must pay full restitution to
those individuals; (3) on a quarterly basis, he must provide itemized
statements for his trust accounts, copies of cancelled checks, deposit slips,
settlement disbursement sheets, and any invoices needed to justify
disbursements from the account, and any other records the State Bar may
demand as necessary to ensure that the trust account is sound; (4) he
must not commit any further disciplinary violations during the
probationary period; (5) he must complete in person an additional six
continuing legal education (CLE) hours in law-office management during
the probation period;" and (6) he must pay the costs of the disciplinary
proceedings, excluding bar counsel and staff salaries.
Based on our review of the record, we conclude that the guilty
plea agreement should be approved. See SCR 113(1). Considering the
duties violated, Boggess' mental state (negligence), the lack of any actual
injury to a client, the aggravating circumstances (prior disciplinary
offenses, 2 a pattern of misconduct, multiple offenses, and substantial
'These CLE hours are in addition to the annual minimum CLE
requirements set forth in SCR 210.
Boggess previously has received three reprimands—one each in
2
2007, 2010, and 2013. Those reprimands did not involve violations similar
to those admitted here but they did involve some of the same lack of
communication underpinning the client complaints at issue here.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(C9 I947A
experience in the practice of law), and the mitigating circumstances
(personal or emotional problems, timely good faith effort to make
restitution or to rectify consequences of misconduct, delay in disciplinary
proceedings, and remorse), 3 we agree that the discipline set forth above is
sufficient to serve the purpose of attorney discipline. See In re Discipline
of Lerner, 124 Nev. 1232, 1246, 197 P.3d 1067, 1077 (2008) (identifying
four factors that must be weighed in determining the appropriate
discipline: "the duty violated, the lawyer's mental state, the potential or
actual injury caused by the lawyer's misconduct, and the existence of
aggravating or mitigating factors"); ABA Standards for Imposing Lawyer
Sanctions, Compendium of Prof? Responsibility Rules and Standards,
Standard 4.12 (2015) (providing that absent aggravating or mitigating
circumstances, "[s]uspension is generally appropriate when a lawyer
knows or should know that he is dealing improperly with client property
and causes injury or potential injury to a client"); see also State Bar of Nev.
v. Claiborne, 104 Nev. 115, 213, 756 P.2d 464, 527-28 (1988) (observing
that the purpose of attorney discipline is to protect the public, the courts,
and the legal profession, not to punish the attorney). 4
3 We note that during the years between the misconduct and the
disciplinary proceedings, Boggess made changes to his practice and
testified at the formal hearing that he now reviews the account
reconciliations and trust statements on a monthly basis.
4Although a reprimand would generally be appropriate for the
diligence violations, see ABA Standard 4.43 ("Reprimand is generally
appropriate when a lawyer is negligent and does not act with reasonable
diligence in representing a client, and causes injury or potential injury to a
client."), we agree with the hearing . panel that the aggravating factors,
multiple violations, and pattern of negligence in dealing with client
property support a suspension.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
3
(0)19(7k e
We hereby impose a 24-month suspension. Boggess shall
serve three months of the suspension, commencing from the date of this
order, and the remainder of the suspension shall be stayed pending his
successful completion of a two-year probationary period. The probationary
period shall commence upon entry of this order. To successfully complete
the probationary period, Boggess must comply with all of the conditions in
the plea agreement, as outlined above. Boggess shall comply with SCR
115. The State Bar shall comply with SCR 121.1.
It is so ORDERED.
a-AA
Parraguirre
-Es-•-t1
Saitta
,J.
Gibbons Pickering 1
cc: Chair, Southern Nevada Disciplinary Board
Olson, Cannon, Gormley, Angulo & Stoberski
C. Stanley Hunterton, Bar Counsel, State Bar of Nevada
Kimberly K. Farmer, Executive Director, State Bar of Nevada
Perry Thompson, Admissions Office, U.S. Supreme Court
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
4
(0) 1.947A