Does 1-24 v. Dist. Ct. (Attorney General)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA DOES 1-24, INDIVIDUALS, No. 64890 Petitioners, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF FILED CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE DOUGLAS SMITH, DISTRICT JUDGE, JAN 2 2 2016 Respondents, TRACE K. UNDEMAN CLERK r SUPREME COURT and BY DEPUTY CLERK CATHERINE CORTEZ MASTO, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA; JAMES WRIGHT, DIRECTOR OF THE NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY; BERNARD W. CURTIS, CHIEF OF THE PAROLE AND PROBATION DIVISION OF THE NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY; JULIE BUTLER, DIVISION ADMINISTRATOR OF THE RECORDS AND TECHNOLOGY DIVISION OF THE NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY; DOUGLAS GILLESPIE, SHERIFF OF THE LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT; PATRICK E. MOERS, POLICE CHIEF OF THE HENDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT; STEVEN WOLFSON, CLARK COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, AND MICHAEL SEGELSTEIN, AN INDIVIDUAL, Real Parties in Interest. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 10) I q4 7A 1 47 -02 2 61 1 ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION This is an original petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenging the implementation of A.B. 579, which establishes new classification, registration, and reporting requirements for sex offenders. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Douglas Smith, Judge. In seeking relief from the district court's denial of their application for a temporary restraining order to enjoin the implementation of A.B. 579, petitioners challenge the constitutionality of A.B. 579. Having considered the petition, we are not persuaded that writ relief is warranted. See NRS 34.160; NRS 34.320; see also Pan u. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) ("Petitioners carry the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."). Further, we note that because the district court order at issue is the denial of an application for a temporary restraining order, the record below is not sufficiently developed for judicial review. See Pan, 120 Nev. at 229, 88 P.3d at 844. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED. e.“...N- Parraguirre —L-tit.tia\ J. Hardesty FA'3 J. Douglas Gibbons SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 3 (0) 1947A et. cc: Hon. Douglas Smith, District Judge McLetchie Shell LLC Robert L. Langford & Associates Frank J. Cremen Henderson City Attorney Attorney General/Transportation Division/Las Vegas Marquis Aurbach Coffing Clark County District Attorney/Civil Division Eighth District Court Clerk SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 4 (0) 1947A