IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
ELIAHU ELEZRA, A/K/A ELI ELEZRA; No. 69654
AND PINI LABOUZ,
Petitioners,
vs.
THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
FILED
COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, JAN 2 8 2016
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK;
AND THE HONORABLE LINDA MARIE
BELL, DISTRICT JUDGE,
Respondents,
and
JOHN BERRY,
Real Party in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION
This original petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition
challenges a district court order denying a motion for summary judgment.
Having considered the petition and supporting documents, we conclude
that our extraordinary intervention is not warranted because an appeal
from any adverse judgment provides petitioners with an adequate remedy
at law, see NRS 34.170; NRS 34.330; Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court,
120 Nev. 222, 224, 88 P.3d 840, 841 (2004) ("[T]he right to appeal is
generally an adequate legal remedy that precludes writ relief."), and they
have not demonstrated that summary judgment was clearly required by a
statute or rule or that an important issue of law requires clarification, see
Nevada Ass'n Servs., Inc. v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 130 Nev., Adv.
Op. 94, 338 P.3d 1250, 1253 (2014) (reiterating that this court "generally
will not exercise [its] discretion to consider petitions for extraordinary writ
relief that challenge district court orders denying motions for summary
judgment, unless summary judgment is clearly required by a statute or
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
(0) 1947A
rule, or an important issue of law requires clarification" (quotation marks
and citations omitted)); Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d at 844 ("Petitioners
carry the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is
warranted."). We therefore
ORDER the petition DENIED.
cc: Hon. Linda Marie Bell, District Judge
Chattah Law Group
Ganz & Hauf/Las Vegas
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(0) 1947A