IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
RIGOBERTO ENRIQUE ISZAZ, No. 69298
Petitioner,
vs.
THE STATE OF NEVADA,
FILED
Respondent. FEB 1 0 2016
TRADE K. LINDEMAN
CLERK OF SUPREME COURT
BY
ORDER DENYING PETITION DEPUTY CLERK
This is a pro se petition for a writ of mandamus. Petitioner
challenges the effective assistance of his counsel and seeks an order
directing the district court to produce the original stenographic transcript
of a hearing on September 23, 2013. We have reviewed the documents
submitted in this matter, and without deciding upon the merits of any of
the underlying claims raised therein, we decline to exercise original
jurisdiction in this matter. See NRS 34.160; NRS 34.170. A challenge to
the validity of the judgment of conviction must be raised in a
postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed in the district court
in the first instance.I NRS 34.724(2)(b); NRS 34.738(1). Petitioner has
failed to demonstrate a need for the original stenographic transcript of the
September 23, 2013, hearing. Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.
C.J.
Parraguirre
J.
'We express no opinion as to whether petitioner could meet the
SUPREME COURT
procedural requirements of NRS chapter 34.
OF
NEVADA
ce):44
(0) I947A
140 -0 14 q 2_3
cc: Rigoberto Enrique Iszaz
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
(0) I947A 01009
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
RIGOBERTO ENRIQUE ISZAZ, No. 69298
Petitioner,
vs.
THE STATE OF NEVADA,
FILED
Respondent. FEB 1 0 2016
TRADE K. LINDEMAN
CLERK OF SUPREME COURT
BY
ORDER DENYING PETITION DEPUTY CLERK
This is a pro se petition for a writ of mandamus. Petitioner
challenges the effective assistance of his counsel and seeks an order
directing the district court to produce the original stenographic transcript
of a hearing on September 23, 2013. We have reviewed the documents
submitted in this matter, and without deciding upon the merits of any of
the underlying claims raised therein, we decline to exercise original
jurisdiction in this matter. See NRS 34.160; NRS 34.170. A challenge to
the validity of the judgment of conviction must be raised in a
postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed in the district court
in the first instance.I NRS 34.724(2)(b); NRS 34.738(1). Petitioner has
failed to demonstrate a need for the original stenographic transcript of the
September 23, 2013, hearing. Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.
C.J.
Parraguirre
J.
'We express no opinion as to whether petitioner could meet the
SUPREME COURT
procedural requirements of NRS chapter 34.
OF
NEVADA
ce):44
(0) I947A
140 -0 14 q 2_3
cc: Rigoberto Enrique Iszaz
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
(0) I947A 01009