Momolu V.S. Sirleaf v. C. Wall

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-8017 MOMOLU V.S. SIRLEAF, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. C. WALL, Chaplin, GraceInside Chaplin Services, Inc., sued individually and in official capacity, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Roderick Charles Young, Magistrate Judge. (3:15-cv-00338-MHL-RCY) Submitted: February 5, 2016 Decided: February 17, 2016 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Momolu V.S. Sirleaf, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Momolu V.S. Sirleaf seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order denying his motion for appointment of counsel without prejudice. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders of the district court, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Sirleaf seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny Sirleaf’s pending motions and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2