UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7834
MOMOLU SIRLEAF,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DAVID ROBINSON, Chief of Operations, VDOC, sued individually
and in official capacity; C. WALL, Chaplin, GraceInside
Chaplin Services, Inc., sued individually and in official
capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, District
Judge. (3:15-cv-00339-MHL-RCY)
Submitted: April 8, 2016 Decided: May 5, 2016
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Momolu Sirleaf, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Momolu Sirleaf seeks to appeal the district court’s order
dismissing his action without prejudice for failing to pay an
initial partial filing fee of $5.70. On appeal, Sirleaf has
provided evidence that he did make the payment. Moreover, it
appears that a payment of $5.70 was received by the district
court and credited in another case. See Sirleaf v. Wall, No.
3:15-cv-00338-MHL-RCY (E.D. Va. Sept. 22, 2015 entry).
This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders
of the district court, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain
interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012);
Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Sirleaf seeks to appeal
is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or
collateral order. See Goode v. Central Va. Legal Aid, 807 F.3d
619, 623 (4th Cir. 2015). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal
for lack of jurisdiction and remand the case to the district
court with instructions to give Sirleaf an opportunity to
reinstate his case. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED AND REMANDED
2