IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
STEVEN SAMUEL BRAUNSTEIN, No. 70224
Petitioner,
vs.
THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA,
FILED
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF JUN 1 6 2016
CLARK, E K. LINDEMAN
Respondent. CI_ RT
al St.
DEP CL
ORDER DENYING PETITION
This is a pro se petition for a writ of mandamus or a writ of
prohibition. Petitioner asks this court to order the clerk of the district
court to file his motion to correct an illegal sentence. Having considered
the documents submitted in this matter, we conclude that petitioner has
not demonstrated that our intervention by extraordinary writ relief is
warranted.' See Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88
P.3d 840, 844 (2004) ("Petitioners carry the burden of demonstrating that
'Petitioner acknowledges that he has been declared a vexatious
litigant by the district court and is thus restricted in his filing privileges,
yet he fails to provide this court with the vexatious litigant order.
Furthermore, he fails to provide any documents showing that the clerk of
the district court refused to file his motion to correct an illegal sentence.
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
(0) 194M att.
isql-io
extraordinary relief is warranted."); NRS 34.160; NRS 34.170; NRS
34.320; NRS 34.330. Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.
Gibbons
cc: Steven Samuel Braunstein
Attorney General/Carson City
Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT
OF
NEVADA
2
(01 1947A e