United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
In the October 14, 2004
United States Court of Appeals Charles R. Fulbruge III
for the Fifth Circuit Clerk
_______________
m 03-60884
_______________
DERIC HEARN; ALVALINE BAGGETT; CHARLES BANKS; JERRY BRISTER;
TOMMIE L. BROWN; JANE DOES 1-50; JOHN DOES; ET AL.,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
VERSUS
CITY OF JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI,
A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION,
Defendant-Appellee.
_________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Mississippi
m 3-99-CV-359-LN
_________________________
Before JONES, SMITH, and STEWART, issued a comprehensive opinion, entered
Circuit Judges. August 12, 2003, dismissing the complaint.
PER CURIAM:* We have reviewed the briefs and applicable
portions of the record and have consulted the
The plaintiffs bring a title VII action for relevant caselaw. Concluding that the district
disparate treatment and disparate impact. court committed no reversible error, we af-
Following a bench trial, the district court firm, essentially for the reasons given by the
district court in its impressive opinion.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has de-
termined that this opinion should not be published and
is not precedent except under the limited
circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.