UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1161
In re: JIANQING WU, and all others similarly situated,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (8:15-cv-01924-PWG)
Submitted: July 21, 2016 Decided: July 25, 2016
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jianqing Wu, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Jianqing Wu petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an
order compelling the district court to follow federal and local
rules of procedure in managing his case and for recusal of the
district court judge. We conclude that Jianqing Wu is not
entitled to mandamus relief.
Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only
in extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court, 426
U.S. 394, 402 (1976); United States v. Moussaoui, 333 F.3d 509,
516-17 (4th Cir. 2003). Further, mandamus relief is available
only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought.
In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir.
1988).
Jianqing Wu has failed to demonstrate that he is entitled
to the relief he seeks. Accordingly, we deny Jianqing Wu’s
motion for initial hearing en banc and deny the petition for
writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2