in Re Valero Energy Corporation Valero Refining-New Orleans, LLC Valero Refining-Texas, L.P. Valero Services, Inc. Valero Unit Investments, LLC Valero Retail Holdings, Inc. Valero International Holdings, Inc. And Valero Refining and Marketing Co.

Summarize
Check Treatment

Related Cases

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas September 2, 2016 No. 04-16-00528-CV IN RE VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION; Valero Refining-New Orleans, LLC; Valero Refining-Texas, L.P.; Valero Services, Inc.; Valero Unit Investments, LLC; Valero Retail Holdings, Inc.; Valero International Holdings, Inc.; and Valero Refining and Marketing Co. Original Mandamus Proceeding1 ORDER Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Jason Pulliam, Justice On August 18, 2016, Relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus. This court is of the opinion that a serious question concerning the mandamus relief sought requires further consideration. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(b). The respondent and the real party in interest may file a response to the petition in this court no later than September 16, 2016. Any such response must conform to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4. It is so ORDERED on September 2, 2016. PER CURIAM ATTESTED TO: ______________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2011-CI-04253, styled Judith Albarran et al v. Koch Specialty Plant Services, et al, pending in the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Michael E. Mery presiding.