in Re Valero Energy Corporation Valero Refining-New Orleans, LLC Valero Refining-Texas, L.P. Valero Services, Inc. Valero Unit Investments, LLC Valero Retail Holdings, Inc. Valero International Holdings, Inc. And Valero Refining and Marketing Co.

Summarize
Check Treatment

Related Cases

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas September 29, 2016 No. 04-16-00528-CV IN RE VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION; Valero Refining-New Orleans, LLC; Valero Refining-Texas, L.P.; Valero Services, Inc.; Valero Unit Investments, LLC; Valero Retail Holdings, Inc.; Valero International Holdings, Inc.; and Valero Refining and Marketing Co. Original Mandamus Proceeding1 ORDER Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Jason Pulliam, Justice On August 18, 2016, Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The court has considered the petition and is of the opinion that Relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The court’s opinion will issue at a later date. It is so ORDERED on September 29, 2016. _________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 29th day of September, 2016. ___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2011-CI-04253, styled Judith Albarran et al v. Koch Specialty Plant Services, et al, pending in the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Michael E. Mery presiding.