\\ic~.A--la..v.H:Ii CA\1:. 0;5(""-."t)(c\ o..~d Qr{:!.,.cl
.. ,r ..
c A-u )E-"- J.Ol'-\ -CR.\0\lo& --t~,3~i-o J
\\-\-S .S1A\~ £J\- \c'lA5 Tk! \ttt=_ D1~1 ({\ t\ CotAR1
vc \f\ -s\JJ)\L:\ALD\~1R\CI
N\AR_C\.A) LDOdJt:Q_ ~E'kf\(l CD\l~Tf ,_TE'lA~
l\J s~ t cT \n"-r Dl- 6- Q AIV D -3' \A. Q_Y
' ~- ,.
\'= ~ \ \\V\o \\rY
FILE IN WRI I FILE
BY: { JllL.:
\0 TIA.~ \~~~r,ero-..b\e_ JvJ~-e of Jo..,'tl (o\AQT:
N~hv Y\Ae.r\,(,) C;b"-YJ
\v\ v 5"\--u>v wit- ;
\.v A\\ f){+~~ JhJe) ev,'c!e<\ce Wo) b;o-J 0-BO.·'~-s\-- (V\-f?_\ O.V\d. Preju.d.'do.\.
O(YT~e. w-.'tf,.dj [19\A.\Il 1\a-1- j d~V\\:fy \-.u--lo-U:v-5-cd Qfde-.fc"da-nl-)Gl~J~OJoJed Ph~h> L'Y\elAf.
3.vT~e. w:\-1"-U) Is()'- Pro~~·~vtc who Is no\- C;~eo-_d(}ble )O.V\ Jkl\ ~vorh.'") +ne _skeefj,
l\ ,vt'\v.\\:pk Dlv A\
\;ve..re. ~"'(\d t>V\ ~,v,'t"'n) \ o,n S+o.~e w.-y ho-ve 131 t' f _90·'~ to W'-o.he.
cleo.\ S Vv,-f-h \iv:t\\t)~ \-o t-~")~Jy o..'3o..'r51 !tv\e (}..~ -+(tl)\'
r,vl_~ ~~ be\hv~d 1-lv\cr\- t~e Dt'!~riCt AHerY\eY ~~ ()r he-vc. PN.)(t'-ttd (o-he ev•'del'\ee
~ f ~e d () f'fe r.F- ~
~' A Pr&JcCv..tOr V'\'\.o,_'J f\Ot vv--1}-he {'6\\5(' O/ Vv~:slev..o.''"' ot6'-~t .... c.. ~J ~0 A &--ret-1\d JIA, y
+~a..\- I ~ \J.....V\ fo,'( h) th. (' lAc c"'} e a I
l~ 1he. F(}.\)e. o..\\;~().t•'DV\ o..re 0\ \f,'o\o.L'o"' o-f',
(jJ_1~e S-\-V\ Ar'\e~~.~~c"'( ()T tV\~ \A-). ((OV\Jh'kt.'s~-5; 9tOZ 9 2 N'Vr
@ Dftco-\ DPrreJ),'D"'· SMddV 1VN~&VIH:l :lO lHnoo
~1~e. \l.H"" Aw..c . . ~wd~(\~0f V\-\ {&V\jkt"'t,'»ll\ 0LA.1:: ProccJJ,WI 031\1303~
@ ~0\-e', A\)o ;V\ br,(f [JhA,\/Ufil\.h'»{\ Vv\'th Deduh'vt I 1'\e v(/ CI!>Y\fcjjt"~
+o 0\.\\d [r,'f"'e 'I G-'r\ \1\.evt/ V"'--ef\~•'Oif"' t\1\.e Prc~>.s\-.'r.. \-c wiHV\nJ 1'\""Mt 19 l'\.
\Y\d:c-\-""-{(\t~.
\ \ \ I
(\"-{:~"~ t~'\e_ tr.'o.\ ~f t\t\~ LQ'Sc\th.e. ~e..-Fc"d(),"r Is e:-1'\}/ilec\ toG'Copj
Q~ 1-h.e. ~ro--lld ?v..ry l-e>Jt:~o"y '(Qr 0--Y\-V w:t~e)y +~..~~.·,c,:"'
beh£)_\f f)-F tke s:6\~e_, OV\
\\\,s ;e0~·~"-~(\Y i~ o.__\A1~ar; 2 ed. bt ?(vk_ l9-\~(f')(3) vf\-e~a5 {.2.v.\tJ ~-{Cr:JIA,"o-\
tv:aer-c~~ o.'(\~ t~-e ~f'{c'\do-"t (}..1'\~ C~~>u_.r-~e\ l\ ctl\t:t\ed +o v-ev:e--- J~.Art\ t-e.St·'""'-t.PI'\Y
Proc~~cli"-~5\\0 Prcvcl'\\ ~'~'9v-.t'f;c~~~.\- dela--y d"'-r:..-~ ~r.'o-\ Co-be) th-e 5to-~<: .>h~>v~ld he
OldernL ~Q (Jff)v,'de (Jr(J'r-d. Jv...rY ~h-~-e.,_c~~.H, ll\ 0\dva- ... cc. 6;( +r.'ll'\•
. W""-f_rrcfcYrc Pre.~:H) Cl9V\5.'d...._,+ .ill_
he\-S
tro-.~"-)w~Hn:l to -\-~e. ('Jfkcc: (!){ SIAPrc.~e_ (o\Art Gf Cr,'VV','V'o~ AfPeo-.\.5 6\d&-,~o\
\fv, \L\,~\-~ (l_Q()M \0~ AIA)~:I\,i~ l~ll\
1'\evv- {l}v~ C B{,
Cause NO: d.__Vl \.-\ - L K \ D \ G8
c ~ "' H
\ 6 v- ;G : o-.' .1\\
~ ~Ol~- C~)s-l Oj .~
THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE DISTRICT COURT
vs. i.U_ JUDICIAL DISTRICT
BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS·
.•.
~V\ ~ ) Q r fc· \ ed Y\evv c Q\1') ct\~ol~- CQJe>\ (Q 8
MOTION REQUESTING PROSECUTION TO
REVEA.Ir AGREEMENT WITH WITNESS
TO THE HONORABLEJUDGE OF SAID COURT:
'· ..... .
Come now ~A- (.( \.A. ) D0 c c eER'
Defendant in the above styled
and numbered cause and files this Motion Requesting Prosecution to Reveal
Agreement with Witnesses, in the nature of concessions by the State of Texas to
the witness which could influence the testimony of the witness, and in support of
said motion would show the Court the following:
I.
The witness, A- V\ t_\_lt_ 0 ~(\\A L :i~~ooperating conspirator
1'\ 0
in the offense with which the Defendant is charged. The witness will testify on
direct examination as a key prosecution witness and his testimony seeks to
implicate inculpate Defendant as having engaged in the criminal conduct alleged
herein.
II.
--· ·-· --- . .
If the prosecution has made either promises or implied that it will make
concessions to the witness in. order to induce his testimony, the defense has a right
to know the nature of the concession made, promised or implied to the witness or
his representatives in order to prove that the witness' testimony was biased by
such decisions. Without such disclosure, defense counsel can only speculate that
the concessions probably involve doubtful proof on the issue of credibility. To
deny disclosure of information which could influence the witness testimony
violates Defendant's rightto due process oflaw.
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Defendant prays the C~:mrt issue
an Order requiring the prosecution reveal the exact nature of negotiations arid
k
discussions with the witness DA-N\ tLLE._ f2> r ,' o---- lo PE: 4-or his attorney
concerning any promises or expectations, expressed or implied, regarding
concessions which could or might be expected to occur in the event witness
0 M l
(]\I'\~ -e._ I\ e £>- r ,· 6-_ (9 PI= 7 cooperated with the prosecution by testifying
against Defendant herein
Respectfully submitted,
Attorney for Defendant Defendant
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
0
I, hereby certify that on this the~ l1 ~[\day of e c