Brad and Randi Aery, and the House Intervenors Lloyd House, Robert Eugene House, Magdalen House, Judith Ann House, Wayne House, Jimmy R. House, Edna Pawelek Ulbrich, Peter Pawelek, Jesse Pawelek, Ruby Pawelek Schumacher, Elizabeth Pawalek Reigh, Roy Mitch v. Hoskins, Inc.

-·-· -··- - ..... -· -------~ ----'--- - ----------------......., CAUSE NO. M-12-0045-CV -A BRAD AERY and RANDI AERY, § IN THE DISTRICT COURT FILEDOF IN Plaintiffs, and § 4th COURT OF APPEALS § SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS J. L. HOUSE TRUST, ET AL. § 05/20/2015 4:00:54 PM Intervenors and Third-Party Plai·ntiffs, § KEITH E. HOTTLE § Clerk vs. § MCMULLEN COUNTY, TEXAS § ; · · c·~c·•rs~~voF HOSKINS, INC., C. CLIFTON HOSKINS, ETAL. Defendants, and § § § f4\. w ~ ·i ~-- FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS i: -: ANTONIO,.nTEXAS f; RECORO[D § SAN AURORA RESOURCES CORPORATION, § u : 05/20/2015 1' ~ ·::. ~ • .' ·.· 4:00:54 PM 0 ARMADILLO E&P, iNC., formerly known § ~~· ·.:, . KEITH E. HOTTLE as Texoz E&P i'I, INC., TEXOZ E&P I, § ·~ ,. •.. .., . -..... ,, r ''• • ~~ i • •• ·' • . Clerk .. •.. ~ )· r f"~. 'Il ''-Y. I : ·. : '~ I ' INC., SEA EAGLE FORD, LLC, § SUNDANCE ENERGY, INC., and KEBO § OIL & GAS, INC. § 36TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT Third-Party Defendants § AGREED ORDER DISMISSING • TEXOZ E&P i, INC.'S AND AURORA RESOURCES CORPORATION'S CROSS-CLAIMS FOR CONTRIBUTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE Currently pending before the Court are Third-Party Defend~t Texo? E&P I, Inc.'s ("Texoz I") Cross-Claim for Contribution against Cross-Defendants C. Clifton Hoskins, Lee Ann Kulka, Lee Roy Hoskins, III, Andrea Jurica, Blake Hoskins, Brent Hoskins, Leonl»'d Hoskins, and Hazel Q. Hoskins, in her capacity as trustee of the Hazel Q. Hoskins Living Revocable Trust; and Aurora. Resources Corp.'s ("Aurora") Cross-Claim for Contribution against Cross-Defendants C. Clifton Hoskins, Blake C. Hoskins, Brent C. Hoskins, Lee Roy Hos~ins, III, Jane W. Hoskins, Andrea Jurica, Lee Ann Kulka, Leonard Hoskins, and Hazel Q. Hoskins, individually and as trustee of the Hazel Q. Hoskins Living Revocable Trust (the "Cross-Claims"). The Court's previous rulings have rendered the Cross-Claims MOOt. Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS that Texoz I's and Aurora's Cross-(;la1ms be Exhibit C 01..685 . . . . DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, subject to the resolution of this case by the Court of Appeals. ..;;- ~bv-- SIGNED thi s~) day of Se~tember, 2014. ~~~ . JUDGE PRESID~ A~ • • 2 01686