--;\Mg;&§) goss . ' , RE<;E:\/ED|N _ y - y ` z _ COJRTGFCR'WNALAPPEALS ' ‘ Asssllzm§ 33 555'0§ , Ab@m@@@%a,©i@§k ` ix €Q@M:,§ \. 2262 wee 616~622266 1a state’ s 21ndtngs¢96' _ ' 22 JUne 26 2014, 299116622 22620 266 262 26 explain 616 enziclemane 26 e 222 extension and 20 eubmi& a §ecggd pro se Metien 262 2226221¢2 02 Time to 2110 a 222, (aee 22h1b12 1)., This 2222 was 216»026266 16 Saeue’e 2126163292. 02 Novembe2 14,2014, 222 66222 sales 2222 229112222*2 pro 26 § y 292 was 26621966 nnu&mely 62 duly 11,20142 2226162262, 262 TD€J “_ mailroom 222162212 and 22222'2 21261232#11, 2626 29112069 626€£ 1221166 Papeta 662 via 9.8. Pestal Seeviae en duly 1,2014.,,9’€ ' (see 2221212 2). Th1s 2222 was nos 1noluded 12 222 seate o .21221222~% v 1 '~ w y 2622 » 2 62 3 ._ fn Verburgt v Dornar, the Court h§1d that "a m5t10n for _F§extension of time 1a necessarily 1mp11éd when an appellant act1ng Yin good§” faith £11ee, w1th1n the 15~day par1qd in which he wou1d be 4 :`entihled 15 move to ext§nd the filing deadllns, documents showing a f"\_§ona f1de 1ntent to appeal.": Id 959 SWZd 615 617(Tex 1997); Gat! '» 2662 WL 1806866, at#1.f ; ' ' » z ` 5 In the instant ease, Applicant-acting 1n 1good‘ fa1th~£11ad 1'dur1ng the 15- -day entitlement to an extension(pnr T R A P. 66 2(¢)) 111 _.an Amended Mot1on for 6n Bdnc Reaon. (Juns 26 ,2014) and his pro se 1 PDR(JuIy 1,2614)§ thus showing a bona fide*intent to Appeal just "deys after receiving the denial Otden 06 his extension request»6 "'!pRAyER y »z;;€¢, FOR THESE REASONS, thé App11oant neapecefully PRAYS the _Trial Court incorporate Applicant' s objections along with the Staee' s Findings of Fact and that the Trial Court recommend these coherent findings to the Court of Appaals; that based on vthese facts, App115ant be given permission to neaubm1t his pro se ' 'Petition for Discretionary Rev1ew. ,,’f: " .` ' d ' b 1 :; . 4 ) .? ' Respectfu_liy submitted on this \the 5““ day of 1\\), 051 ' App11cant pro ss- #1826499 ';__ l §J¢H}§¢ ,. Connally Un1t ` :"§ 1;<36§;`@ §11¢}3;5 , 899 FM 632 § ` ‘ L'= v @;.j »`§@, &\n Kenedy, Tx_78119 _1;;1§* 1.3]_~§~:£:}} “ cca filg/da,Ttavie Cnty hist Clerk, Court of Cniqinal Appeals$V// f ~ FAQFL.;B 01'§3 _. CC: file £5`1!.`.'1 C_ERT|F|QAT|_E_ OF SERV_|CE do hereby jrcertify that a_ true and correct copy of _the foregoing 1\111~;1,;»11§ 313 313§3 323 __ 1 3 :. 331-____ 11)335`§1\. 3 1111‘1;1§3}\11 551 `z`\ Q 1b ““{ §;1{1 ,\1\131,~1§>¢ 51 1__3_,3333;3‘ 33 has b`een forward by the U. S. mai|, postage paid,l f pst clas:§ to the /11)1)1. - 1 1111“§('£‘11 _}1~’ \111§\% {\113§111131 9115”0,1?2}%@1`1.1 'H{\'l f “§1‘11):\… :YX:;`:. mlmw 3§_' 1911 §‘_ 111111~1.~111111.‘131}\.1111‘\1>/.\)1~¢“1'\11\§§§11~1>»\1“`51 90“§;51"§!1 \11:'5~5(5{‘§ §11$1,){111¢135‘:1\3 ?3:'§ who shall serveacopyto thé: L§{§ 13111111§'11111 1153 1`1\1)011§1»§ 1[ExECuTEDoNTHlsTHE §&`“- DAY'o`F 311113`113`1`3~§;_ -- ;201§5]- Respecrfuny submiued, .` 1\-»~\\_¢~1 1 "':33:"`)/11'\(1_1~ \[11 k §:551~»1 _P\ § Appeuam- -TDCJ# ' _ 11#1'“1\111\`_,®§)11 z ` Unit' INMATE's uNswoRN DEcL`ARATIoN I, Donald Aekins, am the applicant and being presently incarcerated in Texas Department of Crnninal Justice, declare under penalty of perjury that, _ according to my be1ief, the facts stated in the above application are true »and correct. Under both Federal law (28 U. S. C. Sectlon 1746) and State law (V. T. C. A. Civ11 Practices and Remedies Code, Section 132. 001 - 132. 003), offenders incarceratedv in Texas may use an unsworn declaration under penalty of perjury in place of a "written declaration, verification, certlflcatlon oath or affidavit sworn before _, ff@;siff ““f a Notary Public. le‘ .g. Respectfully Submitted on this the éday of 20`§§ "Appellant prop Connally Unit- 899 FM 632'~' i. .H Kenedy, Texas,_78119