Ralston, Michael Paul

Micheal Ralston Q%,M2~Cb TDCJ #1219556 Robertson Unit 12071 F.M. 3522 Abilene, Tx 79601 Febuary 26/ 2015 MOTION DENIED Court of Crimal Appeals of texas P^TP* <>'^~ '^ Clerk _«, a r P.O. Box 12308 1YlJLLu== ts>«v«» Austin/ Tx 78711 RE: WR-58/642-06/ EX PARTE RALSTON Dear Clerk of the Court/ Please find enclosed one oriqinal of this APPLICANT'S MOTION TO RECONSIDER UNDER TEXAS CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE/ ARTICLE 11.01. Please file this motion and present it before the court. Thank vou for your time in this matter. Respectfully/ Micheal Ralston i,Gk CAUSE NO.: WR-58.642-06 EX PARTE § IN The COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS MICHEAL RALSTON § OF TEXAS § APPLICANT'S MOTTON TO RECONSTORR UNDER TEXAS CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURES, ARTICLE 11.01 COMES NOW/ MICHEAL RALSTON/ "Applicant" Pro-Se, and respectfully requests this Honorable Court grant this his APPLICANT'S MOTION TO RECONSIDER UNDER TEXAS CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, ARTICLE 11.01. In support of this request Applicant shows this Cour the following: (1) This court used the ruling of Ex Parte Harrington, 310 S.W.3d 452 (Tex. crim. app., 2010) based on the case being challenged had been discharged. In the Harrington case the Court dismissed the case when it was used in a later conviction that was obtained after Harrington's release and rearrest. The Court ruled that it was a "Consequence of Release". In the case for Appl- icalnt, Applicant has never been released from state custody since the arrest on the challenged case. This means that the consequences of Release do not apply and thus making Applicant's case distinguishable from Harrington. (-2) The matters being challenged in Applicant's case have bearing not only on the case being challenged, but also the case Applicant is still in custody for. Applicant must challenge the legallity of his arrest in this case as this was the only arrest and the factors in this case effect the case being challenged as well as the case applicant is still being held for as it was a joint situation between both Brown County and Tarrant County. Applicant now respectfully requests this Honorable Court take a moment and reconsider this case at hand as it is distinguishable from the ruling made previously. PRAYER Applicant prays that this Honorable Court qrant this his APPLICANT'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDER UNDER TEXAS CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, ARTICLE 11.01. Respectfully, Micheal Ralston