Affirmed and Opinion Filed February 25, 2015
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-13-01052-CR
RONALD TERRELL FLOYD, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. F12-11185-M
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Bridges, Fillmore, and Brown
Opinion by Justice Bridges
Ronald Terrell Floyd pleaded guilty before a jury to felony driving while intoxicated.
See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. §§ 49.04(a), 49.09(b)(2) (West Supp. 2014). After finding appellant
guilty, the jury assessed punishment at five years’ imprisonment. On appeal, appellant’s attorney
filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief
meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a
professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to
advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–12 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978).
Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro
se response, but he did not file a pro se response. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–21
(Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (identifying duties of appellate courts and counsel in Anders cases).
We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824,
826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree
the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably
support the appeal.
We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
Do Not Publish
TEX. R. APP. P. 47
131052F.U05
/David L. Bridges/
DAVID L. BRIDGES
JUSTICE
‐2‐
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT
RONALD TERRELL FLOYD, Appellant Appeal from the 194th Judicial District
Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No.
No. 05-13-01052-CR V. F12-11185-M).
Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges,
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Fillmore and Brown participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
Judgment entered February 25, 2015.
‐3‐