Eric Drake v. Seana Willing

May 21, 2015 No:03-14-00665-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN, TEXAS ERIC DRAKE Plaintiff-Appellant v. KASTL LAW FIRM P.C. ET AL Defendant-Appellee ON APPEAL FROM THE 200™ DISTRICT COURT TRAVIS COUNTY, AUSTIN, TEXAS Trial Court No. D-l-GN-14-001215 APPELLANT ERIC DRAKE'S RESPONSE TO APPELLEES BRIEF Eric Drake Pro-Se Appellant PO Box 833688 Richardson, Texas 75083 214-477-9288 RECEIVED APPELLANT ERIC DRAKE'S RESPONSES TO APPELLEES BRIEF TO HONORABLE JUSTICES OF SAID COURT: Appellant Eric Drake files this response to Appellees brief in the above entitled and numbered appeal. Appellee brief continues with their misconceptions and intentional distortions regarding recusal of judges in Texas state courts. Once a motion for recusal is filed in a state proceeding, nothing can take place until the proper procedures pursuant to Tex. R. Civ. P., 18a and 18b are undertaken, which did not occur in the pending legal case before this Court. All of the Appellant's objections in his brief are reinforced in this response to Appellees brief, and the Appellant see's no value in restating them. After Charles Ramsay was made aware of the recusals, he should have stopped all proceedings, and his failure was an abuse of discretion. The notion that Appellant cannot object to Warren Vavra is also erroneous or that any objection to him is waived. The secretary in Mr. Vavra office referred to him as "the judge," and Scott Graydon referred to him as a judge—when he is not a judge. "Despite doing nothing to make trial court aware ofthepotentially disqualifying circumstance, is not deemed to have waived the issue and may raise the issue ofthe trialjudge's disqualification for thefirst time on appeal" In re D.D., Jr., 2010 WL 3718564 (Tex. App.- -Amarillo 2010). Drake never waived his objection to a court employee who was masquerading as a judge. Vavra impersonating a judge is a violation of the TRCP and other Texas laws. The trial court not acting on the Appellant's motion to recuse was an abuse of discretion, and thus as previously stated in Drake's original brief all orders sign are void. In re Kiefer, 2010 WL 2220588 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2010, no pet.). Appellees alleged that there was good cause, but in this case there is never no good cause to violate TRCP 18a and 18b, nor good cause for Graydon to commit perjury. The presiding judge never ruled on Drake motion to recuse. TRCP 18a(f)(l)(B). In re Norman; In re Perritt. Furthermore, it is a mandatory requirement that the appointment of a judge must be by either the presiding judge of the administrative region, or the Chief Justice of the Texas Supreme Court, therefore, Vavra appointment of a judge would be considered as a constitutional disqualification which cannot be waived. Spigener v. Wallis, 80 S.W.3d 174, 180 (Tex.App.-Waco 2002, no pet), See TRCP 18a(b)(2), (g)(3)(B); Freedom Comms. V. Coronado; Buckholts ISD v. Glaser; and Jennings v. Garner. The entire proceeding to declare Appellant a vexatious litigant on August 19, 2014 occurred without proper legal procedure, because there was an effort to push the matter through to declare Appellant as a vexatious litigant at any cost, even at the cost of perjury, the appointing of visiting judges by someone who is not authorized to do so by the TRCP, and a visiting judge who is aware of the pending recusals that the Appellant filed, and the fact that those recusals had not been ruled on, nevertheless, Judge Ramsay continued to hear the legal proceeding was not only error but Drake believes a conspiracy—especially after reviewing Ramsay's history of hatred of nonwhites. Drake was entitled to a hearing, which did not occur. See TRCP 18a(g)(6). Moreover, again, the hearing wasn't even set on the court's docket. Appellant was at the trial court to pick up records. Appellees filed their frivolous motion to strike because they are fully aware after reviewing the Appellant's brief that their argument is also frivolous, and without factual legal support in their brief. Regardless of how this Court rules, Seana Willing, Scott Graydon, Charles Ramsay, Warren Vavra and others who are involved in wrongfully declaring the Appellant a vexatious litigant will be sued for $25,000,000.00. Graydon, Willing, Vavra, and Ramsay will not be able to hide behind any immunity, because their efforts were part of a criminal act and intentional conspiracies against the Appellant on account of his race. How this Court rules will not affect the Appellant's filing of a lawsuit in federal court for damages. However, if the Appellant has to appeal this matter to the Texas Supreme Court (Petition for Reivew), and again to the U.S. Supreme Court to reverse the order declaring him a vexatious litigant, the amount of damages will increase. Appellant requests all and any relief that he has already requested in his original brief, and any other relief that the court may grant him that he may show justification. Respectfully submitted: Eric Drake PO Box 833688 Richardson, Texas 75083 214-477-9288 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on April 12, 2015, I served the foregoing "APPELLANT' REPLY BRIEF," by causing one paper copy sent by certified first-class U.S. Mail to the Clerk of the Court of the 3rd Court of Appeals Austin, and one copy was Hand Delivered to appellees legal counsel as shown below: Scot Graydon 300 West 15th Street, Ste 2 Austin, Texas 78701 512-475-4413 David Harris 300 West 15th Street, Ste 2 Austin, Texas 78701 Telephone: 512-475-4413 Kastl Law P.C. 4144 N. Central Expressway Ste 300, Dallas, Texas 75204 Telephone: 214-821-0230 Vikki Ogden 411 Elm Street, Ste 500 Dallas, Texas 75202 Telephone: 214-653-7568 Eric Drake CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE 1. EXCLUSIVE OF THE EXEMPTED PORTIONS, THE REPLY BRIEF CONTAINS 777 words. 2. THE BRIEF HAS BEEN PREPARED: A. In proportionally spaced typeface using: Software Name and Version: Microsoft Word 2008 in Times Roman font, 14 point for text and 12 point for footnotes. Eric Drake Pro-se April 12,2015 Eric Drake PO Box 833688 Richardson, Texas 75083 May 15.2014 Jeffrey D. Kyle Clerk of Court Third Court of Appeals PO Box 12547 Austin, Texas 78711 RE: In re Eric Drake. Cause Number: 03-14-00665-CV Dear Honorable Kyle: Please find the corrections the Court requested. 1 decided it would be simpler to send the entire brief since it is very short rather than just the certifications. Thank you. If there are any questions or comments please contact me at the above address, or by telephone at: 214-477-9288 or by email at: emike899@gmail.com Yours truly. Eric Drake PRESS FIRMLY TO SEAL "•^POSTAGE •wyfls.Tx AMOUNT 1007 $1999 000871^3 EKA73B7SH0US FROM: (PLEASE PRINT) PHONE ( ) &' ' - L EKflVBBTSlbDUS PRIORITY LU UNITED STATES _i •MAIL* QQ POSTAL SERVICE* CD PAYMENT BY ACCOUNT (if applicable) EXPRESS™ UJ CO UJ DELIVERY OPTIONS (Customer Use Only) ORIGIN (POSTAL SERVICE USE ONLY) Q- • SIGNATURE REQUIRED Note: Tho mailor must chock the•Signature Required" box ilIhe mailer 1) • '-Day • 2-Dny • Military Ddpo O Roqunes the addressee's signature; OR 2) Purchases additionalinsuranco;OR 3) Purchases CODservice;OR 4) o Purchases Return Receipt service. IIthe box is not checked, tho Postal Service willleave tho item in the addressee's Scheduled Delivery Date Postage (Mf.VDD/YY) mail receptacle or other secure location without attempting to obtain tho addressee's signature on delivery. < Delivery Options |~1 NoSaturdayDelivery (delivered nextbusinessday) 1 11 UJ fl Sunday/Holiday Delivery Required (additional fee.whore available") Date Accepted (MM/DD/YY) Scheduled Delivery Time Insuranco Fee COD Foo < l~1 10:30 AM Delivery Required (additional fee. where available') D 10.3OAM .-• 3.00 PM •Referto USPS.com' or local Post Office" lor availability. s S • 12 NOON TO: (PLEASE PRINT) PHONE( Accoptodj 10:30 AM Delivery Feo Return R- Live Animal Dam Transportation Foo D PM cc Weight • Flat Rato Sunday/Hohday Premium Fee Total Postage & Foes ,. r UJ /V Accoptanca Employee in.iials h- LL £ ! E . / DELIVERY (POSTAL SERVICE USE ONLY ZIP . 4* (U.S. ADDRESSES ONLY) DeliveryAttompt(MM/DD/YY) Time Employee Signature Dam I I PM Delivery Attompt (MMOD/YY) Employee Signature • For pickup or USPS Tracking'", visit USPS.com or call 800-222-1811. Dam • $100.00 insurance included. Dpm LABEL 11-B. MARCH 2014 PS~N7690-02-000-9995 3-ADDRESSEE COPY O