AFFIRMED; Opinion Filed September 29, 2016.
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-16-00011-CR
MARILYN ANNE WILLIAMS, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court
Collin County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 219-80697-2013
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Lang, Myers, and Evans
Opinion by Justice Myers
Marilyn Anne Williams appeals her conviction, following adjudication of her guilt, for
abandoning or endangering a child. See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.041(b), (e) (West 2011).
The trial court assessed punishment at four years’ imprisonment. On appeal, appellant’s attorney
filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief
meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a
professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to
advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–12 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978).
Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of her right to file a pro
se response, but she did not file a pro se response. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–21
(Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (identifying duties of appellate courts and counsel in Anders cases).
We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824,
826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree
the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably
support the appeal.
We affirm the trial court’s judgment.
/Lana Myers/
LANA MYERS
JUSTICE
Do Not Publish
TEX. R. APP. P. 47
160011F.U05
–2–
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT
MARILYN ANNE WILLIAMS, Appellant On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District
Court, Collin County, Texas
No. 05-16-00011-CR V. Trial Court Cause No. 219-80697-2013.
Opinion delivered by Justice Myers. Justices
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Lang and Evans participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED.
Judgment entered this 29th day of September, 2016.
–3–