Newborn v. Christiana Psychiatric Services, P.A.

SUPER|OR COURT oF THE STATE OF DELAWARE VlleN L. MEDINlLLA LEoNARD L. WlLLlAMs JusTlcE CENTER JuDGE 500 NoRTH KlNG STREET, sulTE 10400 WlLMlNGToN, DE 19801-3733 TELEPHONE (302) 255-0626 January 25, 2017 Tiffany M. Shrenk, Esq. Victor F. Battaglia, Esq. MacElree Harvey, Ltd. Biggs and Battaglia 5721 Kennett Pike 921 N. Orange Street Centreville, DE 19807 P.O. BoX 1489 Attorneyfor Plaz'ntijj‘" Wilmington, DE 19899 Attorneyfor Defendant CPS Bradley J. Goewert, Esq. Thomas J. Marcoz, Jr., Esq. Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin 1007 N. Orange Street, Suite 600 Wilmington, DE 19899 Attorneys for Defendant Estate Re: Newborn v. Christiana Psychiatric Services, P.A., et al. Case No.: N16C-05-04 7 VLM Dear Counsel: This is the Court’s ruling on Defendant Christiana Psychiatric Services, P.A. (“CPS”)’s Motion to Dismiss in the above-captioned case. For the reasons stated below, CPS’s Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. Factual and Procedural Background This is a Wrongful death and medical malpractice action against a deceased psychiatrist, Dr. Jorge A. Pereira-Ogan (“Dr. Ogan”), and his former practice group, CPS, alleging, inter alia, that Dr. Ogan negligently prescribed Plaintiff’s decedent, Lindsay Ballas, a sample medication of Brintellix that caused her to commit suicide in August 2014. CPS moves to dismiss the Complaint for failure to state a claim upon Which relief may be granted. Defendant Estate of Dr. Ogan takes no position on the Motion. The Complaint states three claims of relief. Count I asserts a negligence claim against Dr. Ogan. Count II asserts a negligence per se claim against Dr. Ogan. Count III, the subject of the present Motion, is a claim of negligence against CPS. Count III, While titled simply “negligence,” alleges two distinct claims: one of direct liability against CPS (i.e., a failure to supervise and monitor Dr. Ogan), and another of vicarious liability (i.e., Dr. Ogan acted as an employee and/or agent of CPS and committed negligence Within the scope of this relationship). Count III of the Complaint states that: “At all times relevant hereto, Dr. Ogan Was an employee and/or agent of [CPS].”l Dr. Ogan allegedly used a prescription pad When Writing prescriptions to Ms. Ballas that bore CPS’s name and address.2 The samples of the Brintellix provided to Ms. Ballas before her death Were CPS Samples.3 CPS allegedly failed to “adequately instruct Dr. Ogan as to his statutory duties,” and “failed to monitor the distribution of potentially dangerous medications to Dr. Ogan.”4 CPS “l