Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

The Attorney General of Texas JIM MATTOX hguet 31. 1984 Attorney General SupruIn cowl BulldIng HonorableGrant Joam Opinion No.JH-200 P. 0. Box 12s4s *u*lln.T~ 78711. 2546 ChairMU 512/47$2m PlnatxcComittee Be: Whether a county may uac Telex 9lom741387 Texao State Senate county lquipmantand machinery 1eieocplw SlzI47w266 P. 0. Box 12068.CapitolStation to uaiotain roads In rural Austlu. Texan 78711 subdivirriooa 714Jackm.Sulle 700 oen*s. TX. 7s2024sos Dear SenatorJones: 2lu742e.944 You ark whether the Burnet County comiealonera court ray uac county lqulp8ent and machinery to uriatalu roads lo rural subdlvlaioaa. Parriculrrly.you aak the followlnSqueatlons: 1. Utlstaction 1s necessary to authorize a county to maintain a roadway in a rural sub- 10011*xar,sun9700 dlvislonl’ Hour1on. lx. 77oQ2~111 71- 2. IIIthe fIllaS of a mbdivielon pkt vhlch purport6 to ‘hereby dedicate the roeda. etreete. ao806Broadw4y.sun4312 peeeagewl~re,end lll alleye ohown thereoa to the Lubbock, TX. 79401-3479 uri of .tlwpublic forever’sufficientto authorize mw7476pI) countyrdntesuuce of tho8e roadways? 008 N. TeMh, S&e B You inform UI that an lajunctloawas grented in 1971 prohibiting l4cAnm. TX. 7sso14tlss the comlseloaera court of Bumet Comzty from udag county equlpmeut s12a824547 and uchiaery to n&~taln private roada. Baaed 011this injunction. Burnet.COMty kar ccfumcd:toulntaln roada ia rural aubdlvisionr. Z$OOUrrOplurSUlt4400 qnAnlonb.TX. 78205.2707 Oa April 22, 1972, l lbdlvlaion plet waa filed purport&g to s12J22m101 “herebydedicatethe reeds, ltreets,pamageueys, and a11 llleys showa thereou to the use of the public forever.” All qwlopplunlty/ Afflnnellw Acllon Empbyet l%e Tcru Cuwtitutim authorizes the leglalatureto providefor the conetructloarod rlntenence of public roads. See Tex. Coast. art. VIII. 99; art. XI. 92; art. XVI, 924. Underthie grent of authority, the lellelatureheo delegeted to coalreionerr courte the generel pwer to “(llay out lud latabllsh. chanSe and diacontinua public roada and hlghveys.” ludto “(e]xercleegeneral control over ferries all roads. highva:r~~, end bridge6 la thclr countiee.” V.T.C.S. art. 2351(3) and (6). In addition to theoe general powera. comle8loner~ court8 are given further and more deteflcdpovcro over HonorableCraat Jonas - Page i, (Jn-200) the coaatructlonand maintenanceof public roads by the enactmentof the County Road and Bridge Act. V.T.C.S.ert. 6702-l. The act glvaa cmssionera court* luthorii:)! to (1) uke and enforce all reasonable and neceaaary rule* e~vlordere for the conatructlon and uimteaauce of public road6 except ae prohibitedby law; (2) hire the labor and purchase the machinery end equipment needed to conattuct and uintain public roadr. . . , V.T.C.S.art. 6702-l. i2.002(1~). In the exerkae of thio wthority , comlssioner~ court0 cannotgo beyond the powers eitherexpr~csoly grantedor aeces~arllyimpliedfrom the lenguegeof the grant. Canalesv. Laughlin. 214 S.U.2d 451 (Tex. 1948). Uhlle.coasliaaionere 'kurto have broad dlecretionIn exercising powero expreaaly conferred on them. neverthelessthe beeis for any action aunt be ultimatelyfcund in the conetltutlonor atatutea. -Id. at 453. Except in circumatancea not pertinenthere, comtisdoners courts are not conetitutionally01: statutorilyauthorized to construct or ulntain prlvete roada. Purthermore.case lav expresslyprohibit6the use of "county kbor. utexals or equipment for other than public uae.m Godley v. Duval Ceunl~!. 361 S.W.Zd 629. 630 (Tax. Civ. App. - San Antonio 1962. mo writ). Since ao besiclfor the construction or maintenanceof,priveteroada fs found.inthe conetltutlonor atetuteo. the ctiedonero court mey not exerclae Mach power. . ..- . Nowever. cdeioeere ceurte lre expreaaly authorized by the County-Road and Bridge Act:to constxwct end uhtein public roaddr in their countleo. The Tuam Iklpreme Court set out the bemlc principlea for determiningvben a road becomes a public road, lteting: All roado,vhl& have been laid out a nd latabllshed by authority'of r:he camni~eioners'courte lre $ubllc roada . . , . A road not orl@nally .eotabli&edunder the statutemey become public by long-continuedURIC end ldoptioe la euch by the county comlulon~wa vith the laoent of the owner et by preecript4an. A road may al80 become public. in the aenee that the public have the right to u#e it. by dedication. p. 880 NonorablcCrent Jonas - Page 3 (JH-200) Worthington v. Wade. 17 S.U. 520. 521 (Tex. 1891). These principlea have been carried forward into modern case law, and a-hat elaborated. Beelcelly.there are thr,eeway. a road may become public ouch that a county till have luthority to uintein it. Firat. e road can be latabllahedlb lnltloaa a public road upon a comlaoioners court's ouu motim. Doughty 'I.DePec,,152 S.U.2d 404. 409 (Tex. Clv. APP. - Amarillo 1941. writ ref'd v.<~.m.).or in rerpouse to an epplicatiou thcreforby the requisite number of freeholderrunder the provleions o f lrticle 6702-l - l procedure which requlrea coudemation and avardlngof damage*.V.T.C.S.art. 6702-l. 812.003and 2.004. Second, a public road may be estebll~~hedby premrlptloo. In thla eituatlon. It ia oecesseryto #how that an "uninterruptedu8er of the wey hes been made by the ~public. uutler au adverse claim of right. for the ltdutoty period of Ualtr,tion." Ladle.' Benevolent Society of Beaumontv. UagnolicCmete~~ Co.. 288 S.U. 812. 815 (Tat. Corn'''APP. 1926. judgrt adopted). PinaiK l road uy become a public road by dedication.a setting epert by the fee owner for public use. and acceptance. See Hellbron v., St. Louis SouthwesternRailway Co. of Texas, 113 S.W.10. 612 (Tex: Clv. App. 1908). Thus. In ansver to your f'lrst, question.we concludethat e county lo authoricedto maintain raalweya in rural lbdlvloiono if the roads were eetabli~hedeb inltlo em public road8 by the coaisaiouers court, by prescription.or by dedlumlon end lcceptance by the county. You lleo ask whether the filing o f l subdivisionplat which purporta to "dedlcate~the reeds. ,etreets. paaaagevaym and all alleya ; . . to% the ~u#e Of the public forever" la aufflclent to luthorlxe~c o untyuintauxicc o f th o r r o a dtm y aTo.effect l proper dedlutkss-of .~knd.to public-or, -the owner umt uke l offer of 'dedlcatlon, uh$@;m8< be qwpted. There are tvo kinda of dedlutloo - statutory.andcomon-hv. A statutory de&atiom la 'one ude lo conformity vith the provlaloasof the mtatuteacoaprioingTexas lubdlvioloncontrol. The reylatory lchac dependsupnl the recordetloaof a developer'sup or plat. Article 6626e. V.T.C.8.. providea that no plat of lny mbdivlalon llull be filed rmleoe it lo luthorimd by the coul~olonera amrt . After approvel.the plet lo filed In the office of the county clerk of the county in vhlcb the land liea. Art. 6626a. 12. The edwloners court,la authoricedto vitbhold plat lpproval If a mzbmlttedplet doea nolcmeet the rmqulreaantoof the act. Art. 6626e. 94. But. if the cam&aoionera court doem not dloapprove the plat or doea not refuse to rwthorlre the filing of mch l plet in the county elerk'e office vh~a deciding whether a plat “meet0 the rcquiremente ae eet forth it1 this Act,” the comierionem court in effect approvea the plet end authoriree its film whether it etemps . e*, NonoreblcGrant Jonee - Page 4 (Jll-200) ” approved end luthorlaed” ou the plat or vhether it stamps “not dleepprovedand not unauthorlxed”thereon. Attorney GeneralOpinion Vu-1438 (1962). If the 8ubdlvldercomplieswith the provleioueof article6626a. em authoriced.fllirtS by the ctieelonere court become8 l “mere ~iulsterial duty, the perfc~tmanceof which may be compelled by mNdaN8.” Coliedonere Caret 0. Frank Jester DevelopmentCo., 199 S.W.Zd 1004, 1007 (Ten.Civ. r$p. - Dallee 1947.writ ref’d n.r.e.1. &WXI-~W dedication8are of two claoeea- crpreaaand i=pllad. Ladlea’ Danevolent Society ,:I Beaumont v. llagoollaCemetery Co., maupra, at -814. In both. It ie neceeeary that there be en appropriationof the had by the ovner to public use. ln the one cane, by come esprea8 manlfestetlorof hio purpoee to devote the land to public use; In the othr,.by eiomeact or course of conductfrom which the law would imply +uch an kltent. Id. LonS-contlnueduae by the public la mfflclmt to imply ,Bdedicaa by the ovner.