Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

The Attorney General of Texas December 23, 1982 MARK WHITE Attorney General Mr. James B. Bond, General Counsel Opinion No. ~~-532 Supreme Court Building Texas A and M University System P. 0. Box 12546 319 System Building Be: Whether the Texas Forest Ausfin. TX. 76711- 2546 5121475-2501 College Station, Texas 77843 Service may grant state funds Telex 9101674-1367 to private landowners for Telecppiar 5121475-0266 reforestation of idle lands Dear Mr. Bond: 1607 Main St., Suite 1400 Dallas, TX. 75201-4709 2141742.6944 You have requested our opinion as to whether the Texas Forest Service may grant state funds to private landowners for reforestation of idle lands. 4624 Alberta Ave.. Suite 160 El Paso, TX. 799052793 9151533.3464 The Texas Forest Service is an agency of the Texas A and M University System, under the general supervision of the board of regents. gduc. code SACS. 88.001, 88.102. The board appoints a state 1220 Dallas Ave., Suite 202 forester, who serves as the director of the Forest Service. Educ . ~auston, TX. 77002.6966 7131650-0666 Code sec. 88.101. The general duties and authority of the Forest Service in general, and the state forester in particular, are described in subchapter B of section 88 of the Texas Education Code. 606 Broadway, Suite 312 None of these statutes makes any reference to the grant of state funds Lubbock, TX. 79401.3479 to private landowners for reforestation of idle lands or for any other 6061747-5236 purpose. 4309 N. Tenth, Suite 6 In Attorney General Opinion H-1272 (1978), this office said that McAllen. TX. 76501-1665 the Department of Labor and Standards lacked statutory authority to 5121662.4547 fund a Mobile Home Information Center to be operated by a private nonprofit corporation. Noting the well established rule that an 200 Main Plaza, Suite 400 administrative agency has only those powers expressly granted to it by San Antonio. TX. 76205-2797 statute or necessarily implied therefrom, Stauffer v. City of San 5121225.4191 Antonio, 344 S.W.2d 158 (Tex. 1961), Attorney General Opinions H-897 (1976). M-1131 (1972). the opinion observed that prior opinions which An Equal Opportunity/ had approved grants by state agencies to other public and private Affirmative Action Employer entities had relied on express statutory authority. -See Attorney General Opinions H-140 (1973); C-673 (1966). In our opinion, the Forest Service similarly lacks authority, either express or implied, to grant state funds to private landowners. Even if appropriate legislation were enacted, however, such a grant would raise substantial questions under article III, section 51 and p. 1923 Mr. James B. Bond - Page 2 (MW-532) article XVI, section 6 of the Texas Constitution, which provide, in pertinent part: Article 3, section 51. The Legislature shall have no power to make any grant or authorize the making of any grant of public moneys to any individual, association of individuals, municipal or other corporations whatsoever.... Article 16, section 6. (a) No appropriation for private or individual purposes shall be made, unless authorized by this Constitution.... No proposed legislation has been presented to us, and we cannot speculate as to particular statutory language, if any, which might avoid those constitutional prohibitions. In certain instances, however, both the courts and this office have approved statutes which authorized grants of public funds to private individuals, so long as the expenditure was made "for the direct accomplishment of a legitimate public purpose." Barrington v. Cokinos, 338 S.W.2d 133, 140 (Tex. 1960). See also State v. City of Austin, 331 S.W.2d 737 (Tex. 1960); Davis v. City of Lubbock, 326 S.W.2d 699 (Tex. 1959); Harris County v. Dowlearn, 489 S.W.2d 140 (Tex. Civ. App. - Houston 1972, writ ref'd n.r.e.); Letter Advisory No. 107 (1975). SUMMARY The Texas Forest Service, an agency of the Texas A and M University System, lacks statutory authority to grant state funds to private landowners for reforestation projects. Whether legislation granting such authority would be consistent with article III, section 51 and article XVI, section 6 of the Texas Constitution would depend on whether the grant of state funds would accomplish a legitimate public purpose. -MARK WHITE Attorney General of Texas JOHN W. FAINTER, JR. First Assistant Attorney General RICHARD E. GRAY III Executive Assistant Attorney General p. 1924 . . Mr. James B. Bond - Page 3 (MW-532) Prepared b$ Rick Gilpin Assistant Attorney General APPROVRD: OPINION COMMITTEE Susan L. Garrison, Chairman Jon Bible Roxanne Caperton Rick Gilpin Patricia Hinojosa Jim Moellinger Bruce Youngblood p. 1925