Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Honorable J. K. Williams Opinion No. H-1029 Chancellor Texas A 6 M University System Re: Compulsory fees for College Station, Texas 77043 off-campus students at state supported universities. Dear Mr. Williams: You have requested our opinion regarding the application of section 54.503(b) of the Education Code to university stu- dents who receive instruction off-campus. That statute pro- vides: (b) The governing board of an institu- tion of higher education may charge and collect from students registered at the institution fees to cover the cost of student services which the board deems necessary or desirable in carrying out the educational functions of the insti- tution. The fee or fees may be either voluntary or compulsory as determined by the governing board. The total of all compulsory student services fees collected from a student for any one semester or summer session shall not exceed $30. All compulsory student services fees chargx and collected under this section by the overning board of an institution of lgher education, other than a public junior college, shall be assessed In proportion to the number of semester credit hours for which a student regis- ters. No fee for parking Services Or facilities may be levied on a student un- less the student desires to use the park- ing facilities provided. (Emphasis added). Specifically, you ask whether the compul- sory student services fee authorized by section 54.503(b) may P. 4244 . _ ‘_ Honorable J. K. Williams - Page 2 (H-1028) be waived or modified for students "who do not have physical access to use facilities by reason of being off-campus for : instruction." In Attorney General Opinion H-284A (1974), we held that the student services fee must "be charged proportionately ac- cording to the number of semester credit hours for which a student registers." H-284A (1974) at 2. This result was enacted into law in an amended version of section 54.503(b). Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., ch. 641, at 1759. Subsequently, the Coordinating Board, Texas College and University System, prom- ulgated rules which impose limitations upon the power of a governing board to waive or modify fees. The Board defined two types of "off-campus" courses: "extension" and "resident" courses. As to off-campus resident courses, the Board has directed that public senior institutions . . . require the same tuition, building use fees and student service fees as those charged for the same credit courses on campus. Rule 251.02.12.001(d)(Z), Rules, Coordinating Board, Texas College & University System. In addition, the Board's rules require that "(clertain types of instruction not conducted at an official location may be treated as 'on-campus'." Rule 251.02.12.001(b). Examples of such instruction include "Isltu- dent teaching, internships, clinical instruction, practicums, and field courses. . . ." Id. It is evident that the Board intended that students registered for such "on-campus" courses should be subject to the student services fee. In our opinion, however, the Coordinating Board lacks the authority to promulgate these rules. The Board has been given no general control over public senior institutions in this area. See Education Code,,S 61.021. Section 61.051(j) of the Educamn Code, enacted in 1975, does not furnish such authority because it addresses the question Of course Offer- ings rather than imposition Of fees. It provides merely that (n]o off-campus courses for credit may be offered by any public college or university without specific prior approval of the board. The board shall establish regula- tions for the coordination of credit and non-credit activities of adult and con- tinuing education by public colleges and universities. P. 4245 ’ . -. - . ., Honorable J. K. Williams - Page 3 (H-1028) Section 54.503(b), by contrast, clearly indicates that L the "governing board of [each] institution" shall set the student services fee. In Letter Advisory No. 6 (1973) at 2, in discussing the scope of the governing board's authority under section 54.503(b), we stated that [tlhe governing board of an institution of higher education, in adopting rules and regulations for its operation, exercises delegated legislative powers, and in the absence of a clear showing that it has acted arbitrarily or has abused the autho- rity vested in it, the courts will not interfere. See Foley v. Benedict, 55 S.W.Zd 805, 810 (Tex. Comm'n App. m2, opinion adopted). In Attorney General'Opinion H-284A (19741, we recognized that, within the guidelines of the stat- ute, each governing board may prescribe its own fee. Pro- vided that the fee does not exceed $30 per student per semes- ter, and so long as it "be charged proportionately according to the number of semester credit hours for which a student registers," we believe that the governing board may waive or, modify the student services fee in appropriate circumstances, including those in which a student does "not have physical access to use facilities by reason of being off-campus for instruction." SUMMARY Within the guidelines of section 54.503(b) of the Education Code, the governing board of an institution of higher education may waive or modify the student services fee for students who do not have physical access to use facilities by reason of being off- campus for instruction. The Coordinating Board is not empowered to promulgate rules governing the imposition of such fees. JOHN L. HILL Attorney General of Texas P. 4246 Honorable J. K. Williams - Page 4 (H-1028) APPROVED: C. ROBERT HEATH, Chairman Opinion Committee klw P. 4247 ‘------‘------I