Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

OF TEXAS AUSTIN. TIZXAS 78711 October 8, 1974 The Honorable Charlee A. Murphy Opinion No. H- 416 Executive Director Texas Aeronautics Commission Re: Authority of the Texas P. 0. Box 12607, Capitol Station Aeronautics Commission to Austin, Texas 78711 assist in development of a municipal airport the property for which in leased to the city. Dear Mr. Murphy: The Texae Aeronautics Commission has received a request for financial aid to make improvements on a municipal airfield. The field is located on land one-half of which is owned by the city in question and the other one half of which is leased from a county school district holding it for invertment purposes. The present lease ie for at least 20 years. Articles 46c to 46c-7, V. T. C. S., establish the Aeronautics Com- mission. Article 46c-6, Subdivision 10, authorizes the Commission to grant or lend funds to, among others, incorporated cities in the state “for the establishment, construction, reconstruction, enlargement or repair of airports. ” Criteria to be coneidered in determining whether or not a grant or loan is to be made are stated as follows: (1) The need for an airport or facility or improve- ment of existing facility in the locality in the light of existing airports or facilities in the area and in light of the overall needs’ of the state, and (2) The financial needs of the community with priority given to areas of greatest need. (3) Loans shall be made in lieu of grants whenever feasible. Prior to approving any loan or grant the Commission ohall require that: p. 1940 The Honorable Charles A. AMurphy page2 (H-416) (1) The airport or faciity remain in the control of the political subdivisioaor political subdivisions involved for at least 20 yers, and (2) The political subdiision disclose the source of all funds for the projedand its ability to finance and operate the project, d (3) All loans shall beas interest at the rate of at least three per-cent per illzlum and have a term of not longer than 20 years, and (4) At least fifty percst of the total project cost be provided from sources o&r than the State of Texas, and (5) The project be adeyately planned. You have asked our opinion as towhether you may legally make a grant or loan when a portion of the real rtate upon which improvements are to be located is leased. Almost the identical question waspresented to this office some years ago and was anewered in Attorney Genewl Opinion C-511 (1965) where it was held that, under Sections 50, 51 and52 of Article 3 of the Constitution the grant or loan of public money to impPve leased land would be unconstitu- tional. Very recently we had occasion toreview Opinion C-511 in another context and concluded that it went too fan Insofar as Opinion C-511 indicates that a public expenditure for the erectioror maintenance of a public facility on leased property is violative of the Cwtitution for the sole reason that the land is leased, it has been overruledby Attorney General Opinion H-403 (1974). Article 3,Sections 50, 51 and 52,and Article &Section 3 of the Texas Constitution do prohibit loans and grantsof state funds for private purposes, but an expenditure made for a proper pullic purpose and for an adequate consideration or public benefit is valid taen though private persons are incidentally benefited. Barrington v. Gkinos, 338 S. W. Zd 133 (Tex. 1960). p. 1941 .’ The Honorable Charles A. Murphy, page 3 (H-416) As we said in Opinion H-403, not every public purpose is a proper one upon which to base a public expenditure, but we think expenditure of state funds pursuant to Article 46c-6. V. T. C. S., in order to improve municipal airport facilities within the state is prima facie for a proper public purpose and not an improper grant to a municipality in violation of Article 3, Sections 50 and 51. It serves a state purpose, and not merely a local one, The Commiseion is directed to make its dectsions “in the light of the overall needs of the state,” and the municipalities may be considered agents of the state to accomplish the purpose. See. State v. City of Austin, 331 S. W. 2d 737 (Tex. 1960); Jones v. Alexander, 59 S. W. 2d 1080 (Tex. 1933); Jefferson County v. Board of County and District Road Indebtedness, 182 S. W. 2d 908 (Tex. 1944). Accordingly, it is our opinion that the Texas Aeronautics Commission might legally make a grant or loan pursuant to Article 46~~6 for the making of improvements on a municipal airfield located or partially located on land leased for a period of at least twenty yearn if all statu- tory raquirements are met and if the grant or loan is made for what is determined to be a proper public purpose and for an adequate consideration (quid pro quo) or publtc benefit. Attorney General Opinions H-403 (1974). M-512 (1969). SUMMARY The Texas Aeronautics Commission is not pro- hibited from making grants or loans of funds, for a proper public purpoee and for an adequate considera- tion or public benefit, to establish, construct, recon- struct or enlarge municipal airports located on land leased for a period of at least twenty years. Very truly yours, Attorney General of Texas p. 1942