Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Honorable Robert S. Calvert Opinion No. M- 1199 Comptroller of Public Accounts - State Finance Building Re: Validity ,of riders in the Austin, Texas 78711 1971 General Appropriations Act, (Acts of 62nd Leg., R.S. 1971, Chap. 1047, pages Dear Mr. Calvert: 3421, et seq.). You have requested our opinion on the . validity _ of 45 rid- .. . ers in the current 1971 General Appropriations Act wnicn are quoted in separate paragraphs as you have numbered them with our opinion following the verbatim quotation of the rider. Certain general principles of constitutional law are ap- plicable to the validity of such riders. These principles may be summarized as follows: An appropriation bill may detail, limit or restrict the use of funds therein appropriated or otherwise insure that the appropriated money will be spent for the purpose intended. Moore v. Sheppared, 144 Tex. 537, 192 S.W.Zd 559 (1946); Linden v. Finley, 92 Tex. 451, 49 S.W. 578 (1899); Attorney General' Opinions O-445 (1939), V-1253 (1951), V-1254 (1951), 2959 (1935), V-1196 (1951). A rider attached to the seneral aoorouriation bill cannot repeal, modify or amend an existing generai law. State v. Steele, 57 Tex. 203 (1882); Linden v. Finley, supra; Moore v. * Attorney General's Opinions 1745 (1917), 2787 %%%96?ff%5,, 2970 (19351, o-445 (i939), o-1837 (i940), G-2573-(1940); O-5329 (1943), V-412 (1947), V-894 (1949), V-1196 (1951), V-1254 (1951), M-1141 (1972). If a bill does more than set aside a sum of money, pro- vide the means of its distribution, and to whom it shall be distributed, then it is a general law. Attorney General's Opinions 2965 (1935), V-1254 (1951); Moore v. Sheppard, supra. The distinction between a general appropriation bill and general legislation has been recognized in this State in the -5852- Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page 2 (M-1199) simple fact that the former merely sets apart sums of money for specific objectives and uses while the latter does more than merely appropriate and limit the use of funds. General legis- lation constitutes a separate subject and cannot be included within a general appropriation bill. Moore v. Shepp ar;,v~y;;f; Attorney General's Opinions 2965 (1935), V-1254 (19 1) (1951), WW-294 (19571, WW-310 (19571, H-280A (1968): . The veto power of the Governor is a Legislative and not an Executive or Judicial function, hence the Governor has only such power as the Constitution confers upon him and he may not disapprove of certain paragraphs or portions of a bill and ap- prove the remainder. Fulmore v. Lane, 104 Tex. 499, 140 S.W. 405 (1911): Attorney General's Opinions V-1196 (1951), M-1141 (1972). The Governor has the power to veto only items of an appropriation bill. The Governor has no authority to veto a rider in an appropriation bill unless it is in itself an item of appropriation. Fulmore v. Lane, supra; Attorney General's Opinion V-1196-il951). The only authority of the Governor to exercise a substan- tive veto power over legislation or items of appropriation is clearly set out in Article IV, Section 14, of the~constitu- tion of Texas. Where the Constitution has spoken and pre- empted this matter, the Legislature is without power either to add to or detract from this constitutional function. In exercising that veto power, the Governor is exercising a Legislative and not an Executive or Judicial function. He has only such power as the Constitution confers upon him; he cannot disapprove of certain portions of a bill which are not items of appropriation, and approve the remainder. Fulmore v. Lane, 104 Tex. 499, 140 S.W. 405 (1911); Annotation, 35 A.L.R. 600, and cited cases: 16 C.J.S. 617, Const. Law. Sec. 139, n. al; 81 C.J.S. 1220, States, Sec. 164, n. 55; and Attorney General's Opinion V-1196 (1951). Aside from the constitutional substantive veto power of the Governor granted in Article IV, Section 14, Texas Consti- tution, there is no other authority provided for him to have a continuing veto power over expenditure of appropriated funds. Any attempt by the Legislature to delegate to the Governor the power to exercise a continuing veto over such expenditures and at his own discretion would constitute an attempt to in- crease the Governor's veto power. Furthermore, if the Legis- lature attempted to grant such power by a rider in an ap- propriation bill, such rider would amount to general legislation -5853- Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page 3 (M-1199) in violation of Article III, Section 35, Texas Constitution, under the authorities cited above. In Attorney General's Opinion M-1141 (1972), we concluded that in view of the authorities cited therein, a rider re- quiring approval of the Governor as a prerequisite to the ex- penditure of moneys appropriated therein was invalid. See also Attorney General Opinion No. M-280 (1968). Applying all of the foregoing principles of constitutional law to the attached riders, you are advised that it is our opinion the riders are valid or invalid according to the com- ments following the language being construed: 1. Page II-43 Section 2, Subsection e, for Special Provisions, which reads, "Salary rates in excess of the minimum amounts specified in Senate Bill No. 116, as amended, and the salaries of coaches and teachers of exceptional children, may be paid with the advance written approval of the Governor; but such ap- proved rates shall never exceed the rates of pay for like positions paid in the public schools of the'City in which the State School or Home is located." That portion requiring written approval of the Governor is invalid, but the remainder of the provision is valid. In support of the valid portions, see hW-229 and WW-282. 2. Page III-11 for the Air Control Board which reads, "None of 'the funds appropriated to or that are available for use by the Air Control Board may be expended by the Board for legal services of any type until the Attorney General has approved the position and person to fill the position. The Comptroller of Public'Accounts shall make payment for such service only after written approval has been received from the Attor- ney General." This rider is invalid because it is an attempt to enact general legislation in an appropriation bill. Opinions VW-1461 and M-249 are overruled where such opinions are in conflict herewith. -5854- Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page 4 (M-1199) 3. Page III-16 for Alcoholic Beverage Com- mission which reads, "None of the funds appropriated hereinabove to the Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission shall be expended for building rentals without the written approval of the Governor." This rider is invalid. M-1141. The provisions of Article 666b, Vernon's Civil Statutes, apply and Board of Control approval is necessary without this rider since it is pre-existing general law. 4. Page III-51 for the Department of Cor- rections which reads, "It is further pro- vided that none of the building appropri- ations made hereinabove shall be expended unless and until such time as the Depart- ment of Corrections shall have filed with the Governor and the Legislative Budget Board an orderly plan for meeting long range construction needs of the Department; and such funds shall be expended only upon approval of the Governor; provided, however, that copies of such requests for the Gov- ernor's approval, and notice of the Gov- ernor's action on such requests, shall be filed with the Legislative Budget Board." This rider is,valid as to informational filing, but is in- valid as to approval by the Governor since it gives the chief executive a second veto power. M-1141 and M-280. 5. Page III-51 for the Department of Cor- rections which reads, "Any unexpended balances remaining in projects under the respective items for Building Appropriations may, with the approval of the Governor, be transferred and used for the purposes of completing construction of other projects enumerated in the same item: provided, how- ever, that copies of such requests for the Governor's approval, and notice of the Gov- ernor's action on such requests, shall be filed with the Legislative Budget Board." -5855- Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page 5 (M-1199) That portion of the rider requiring the Governor's ap- proval is invalid: such approval cannot be required, but that portion requiring filing of information with Budget Board is valid. M-1141 and V-1254. The agency Board must vote the transfer of funds. 6. Page III-53 for the Department of Cor- rections which reads, "The Department of Corrections is authorized to expend funds from the Mineral Lease Fund during the biennium beginning September 1, 1971, to acquire, by negotiation or condemnation, parcels of land solely within the peri- meters of the Coffield Unit. Such ex- penditures, however, cannot be expended without the approval of the Governor. Notice of the Governor's action in such requests, shall be filed with the Legis- lative Budget Board." That portion of the rider requiring the Governor's ap- proval is invalid; such approval cannot be required, but that portion requiring the filing of information with Budget Board is valid. M-1141 and V-1254. The agency Board must vote the transfer of funds. The old language of this item reguired approval of the Legislative Budget Board for ex- penditures. In Opinion V-1254 (1951) we held this violates the separation of powers (V-1254, pages 13-15). 7. Page III-53 for the Department of Cor- rections which reads, "Any unexpended balances as of August 31, 1971, for the Department of Corrections in the general appropriations made by the Sixty-first Legislature, Second Called Session (House Bill No. 2) for the Center for Continuing Education in Corrections (Item No. 24, Page III-551 are hereby reappropriated to the Department of Corrections for the same purposes for the biennium beginning Sep- tember 1, 1971. Provided, however, that such reappropriated funds shall be expended only upon approval of the Governor and that copies of such requests for the Governor's approval and notice of the Governor's actions on such requests shall be filed with the Legislative Budget Board." -5856- Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page 6 (M-1199) That portion of the rider requiring the Governor's ap- proval is invalid: such approval cannot be required, but that portion requiring the filing of information with Budget Board can be required. M-1141 and V-1254. The agency Board must vote the transfer of funds. The old language of this item required approval of the Legislative Budget Board for expenditures. In Opinion V-1254 (1951) we held this violates the separation of powers (V-1254, pages 13-15). 8. Page III-54 for the Board of Dental Exam- iners which reads, "Expenditures of opera- ting appropriations made hereinabove to the Board of Dental Examiners shall be con- tingent upon said Board filing with the Comptroller by not later than the first day of each fiscal year cove.red by this Act, a list of all applicants for licenses to practice dentistry in this State and of all persons actually granted such licen- ses for the preceding twelve-month period, and the basis (whether by reciprocity, by clinical examination only, or by clinical and theoretical examination) upon which such licenses were granted." This rider is valid and is a simple condition which the Legislature has the power to impose in an appropriation act. 9. Page III-77 for the Highway Department which reads "The Highway Department is authorized to rent or lease equipment of any kind except office machines and electronic computers. Office machines will be rented or leased with prior approval of the State Board of Control. Electronic computers will be rented or leased only with the approval of the Governor. This specific authorization shall be construed to be an exception to any prohibitions and re- strictions in the General Provisions of this Act. This rider is valid as to Board of Control approval. Ar- ticle 666b. This rider is invalid as to requiring Governor's approval, since such approval is not supported by general law and is a subject which should be covered by the general law. Further, we think Article 6252-12a is the current general law on this subject and gives the State Auditor duties in this respect. -5857- Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page 7 (M-1199) 10. Page III-77 for the Highway Department which reads, "None of the funds appropriated to the State Highway Department may be expended for the construction of any District Office Building at a cost exceeding Sixteen Dollars ($16) per square foot in construction costs, including engineering and architectural fees, and no building, regardless of type, contain- ing more than ten thousand (10,000) square feet may be constructed without prior ap- proval of the Governor." This rider is invalid. M-1141. 11. Page III-98 for the Library and Historical Commission which reads, "Federal grants made to or received in Federal Public Library Fund No. 118 are hereby appropriated for the pur- poses for which such grants may be made; pro- vided, however, that none of such moneys may be expended for personal services without the advance, written approval of the Governor. Such authorized classified positions shall be governed by the provisions of this Act re- lating to the Position Classification Plan." This rider is invalid. Article 6252-11, the Position Clas- sification Act of 1961, governs this area. See also M-1141. WW-117 allows travel to be paid from this type of Federal funding. 12. Page III-112 for the Parks and Wildlife De- partment which reads, "Any Federal grants, allocations or aids for the conservation and improvement of yame, fish and wildlife, or for improving, developing and planning pub- lic parks, or for any other program or acti- vity under the statutory authority of the Parks and Wildlife Department, may be ac- cepted and disbursed through the State Trea- sury by said Department for the purposes for which they were granted and are hereby appropriated for such purposes: provided, however, that expenditure of any such Fed- eral grants, allocations, or aids shall not exceed the amounts shown in the schedule of -5858- Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page 8 (M-1199) appropriations hereinabove, or for pur- poses and programs not authorized by said schedule of appropriations; and shall have the prior written approval of the Governor." That portion of the rider requiring the Governor's ap- proval is invalid. While Opinion M-266 concerns this fund, no question was there raised as to the validity of requiring prior approval by the Governor. We further hold that Ar- ticle 4050d, V.C.S. is the general law pertaining to this subject and it does not authorize any Governor's approval. 13. Page III-113 for the Parks and Wildlife De- partment which reads, "None of the funds ap- propriated above may be expended for the purchase or rental of additional electronic data processing equipment without the prior written approval of the Governor." We hold this rider invalid because Article 6252a, Vernon's Civil Statutes, is a general law on this subject and this law gives powers to the State Auditor: also invalid per M-280, and M-1141. 14. Page III-113 for the Parks and Wildlife De- partment which reads, "None of the moneys appropriated hereinabove by the item, 'State Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan - for updating Texas' comprehensive outdoor recre- ation plan,' may be expended without the prior, written approval of the Governor, on a budget which describes each character of personal services to be rendered, and none of the moneys in such appropriation item may be expended for reallocating to a higher salary group any position in the State's Position Classification Plan." We hold this rider invalid insofar as the expenditure re- quires the approval of the Governor, and without which the ex- penditure may in effect be vetoed by the Governor. Article 6081r, Vernon's Civil Statutes, is the general law and it does not provide for Governor's approval; also see Opinion M-280. -5859- Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page 9 (M-1 199) 15. Page III-113 for the Parks and Wildlife De- partment which reads, "None of the funds appropriated above may be expended on boats in excess of 20 feet in length without the prior written approval of the Governor; pro- vided, that copies of such requests for the Governor's approval, and notice of the Gov- ernor's action on such requests, shall be filed with the Legislative Budget Board." This rider is invalid insofar as it requires the Gover- nor's approval, (M-280), but is valid as to that portion which requires the filing of information with the Legislative Budget Board. M-1141. 16. Page III-114 for the Parks and Wildlife De- partment which reads, "None of the funds appropriated above may be obligated for construction of buildings or residences each costing in excess of $5,000 without the prior written approval of the Governor." This rider is invalid, M-280. Sec. 5, of Article 6081n, Vernon's Civil Statutes is a general law giving the power to spend funds to the agency. 17. Page III-115 for the Parks and Wildlife De- partment which reads, "The Parks and Wild- life Department is hereby authorized within the limitations of funds appropriated here- inabove for Exempt Positions and Salaries of Classified Positions, to establish new and/or reclassify existing salaried positions for the purpose of implementing all or parts of the Management Study completed on May 25, 1970. Provided, however, that any changes in classified positions made for this pur- pose, shall have the prior approval of both the Classification Officer and the Legislative Audit Committee, and that any changes in exempt positions made for this purpose, shall have the prior approval of the Governor." This rider is invalid. Article 6252-11, Vernon's Civil Statutes, is a general law covering this matter. -5860~ 18. Page III-125 for the Texas Rehabilitation Com- mission which reads, "It is also provided that, in the event of expansions of Federal programs, additional Federal funds becoming available may be used to employ additional personnel necessary to carry out the expanded programs, but only with the advance approval of the Governor; provided, however, that copies of such requests for the Governor's approval, and notice of the Governor's action on such requests, shall be filed with the Legislative Budget Board.* The requirement for informational filing for budget rea- sons is valid, but the approval by the Governor is invalid. M-208 and 1141. 19. Page III-133 for Department of Public Safety which reads, "The Department of Public Safety is authorized to own and operate six (6) air- planes and seven (7) helicopters only. None of the funds appropriated above shall be ex- pended for the purchase of airplanes or heli- copters without the specific approval of the Governor. w This rider is invalid. M-280, M-280A, and M-1141. 20. Page III-133 for Department of Public Safety which reads, "From the amounts appropriated out of the Operator's and Chauffeur's License Fund for the support and maintenance of the Department of Public Safety, an amount not to exceed One Hundred and Twenty Thousand Dollars ($120,000) for each year of the bien- nium beginning September 1, 1971, is hereby designated for the purchase of evidence and/ or information and surveillance expenses deemed necessary by the Department of Public Safety; ard accountability for expenditures as set forth above shall be governed by such rules and regulations as the Director of the Department of Public Safety may recommend, subject to approval by the State Auditor." -5861- Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page 11 (M-1199) This rider is invalid to the extent that the approval of the State Auditor is required over the rules and regulations as to expenditures. C-447 (1965). 21. Page III-136 for Securities Board, which reads, "Emergency transfer of funds between Item 6, 'For salaries of classified positions, part-time and seasonal help, professional fees and,services and witness fees,' and Item 7, 'Consumable supplies and materials, current and recurring operating expense (including travel) and capital outlay,' is authorized upon approval of the Governor." This rider is invalid only to the extent that it provides for the Governor's approval as a condition. 22. Page III-141 for Texas Mass Transportation Commission which reads, "None of the moneys appropriated above may be expended without the prior approval of the Governor." This rider is invalid. M-280, M-280A, and M-1141. 23. Page III-149 for Water Development Board which reads, "Those funds allocated by the Water Development Board under the appropri- ation for topographic mapping, water studies and investigations shall be used for ground water, surface water, chemical quality in- vestigations, sediment sampling studies, playa lake modification studies, studies of the Little Wichita River and other West Texas streams, and the operation of evapo- ration stations, to implement the Upper Sabine Study Contract and shall include statistical compilations and hydrological and other studies and investigations by the State, or in cooperation or by contract with other govermental agencies, institu- tions or non-governmental entities, and may include hourly wages and contract ser- vices. Provided, however, that no such expenditures may be made without the prior written approval of the Governor on a -5862- Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page 12 (M-1199) budget for expenditures which describes each character and object or purpose of obligations to be incurred." This rider is invalid insofar as the Governor's approval is required. M-280, M-280A, and M-1141. 24. Page III-160 for Department of Public Welfare which reads, "In the event of disaster or other unforeseeable contingency, there is hereby appropriated out of the Commodity Distribution Fund No. 39, an additional amount not to exceed $30,000 for the pay- ment of salaries and wages, travel and other operating expenses, provided that expenditure of this additional appropriation must be ap- proved in advance by the Governor, and any position titles and rates of pay required shall be approved by the State Classification Officer." This rider is invalid as an unauthorized delegation of power, and confers an unbridled discretion, without any stand- ards or guidelines, upon the Governor. The requirement of the Governor's approval is also invalid. 25. Page III-165 Special Provisions Riders, which reads, "It is further provided that none of the moneys appropriated in this Article may be expended for the rental of warehouse space in Austin, Texas, for the purpose of storing records or documents without the prior approval of the State Director-Librarian." Article 5435, 5441a, and 5441d, Vernon's Civil Statutes, contain the general law. This rider is surplusage insofar as it states the general law, and is invalid to the extent that it may conflict therewith. 26. Page 1X1-165, Section 6, Subsection c, Spe- cial Provisions Riders, which reads, "When- ever the State Auditor determines that a Petty Cash Revolving Fund is desirable for -5863- Hon. Robert S. CalVert, page 13 (M-1199) a particular department or agency, the Comptroller of Public Accounts shall draw a warrant payable to a local bank on vouchers issued by the department or agency; provided, however, such initial vouchers must bear the approval of the State Auditor. Thereafter, such petty cash revolving fund in the local bank may be expended by checks signed by a bonded employee of the department or agency de- signated by the head of the department or agency to administer such fund. Disburse- ments from the petty cash revolving fund shall be reimbursed from appropriations made for the purposes for which the expenditure was made, and each expenditure from the petty cash revolving fund be supported by a cash disbursement voucher. In the event of an abuse or unwarranted use of any petty cash revolving fund, the State Auditor shall advise the Comptroller of Public Ac- counts to call in immediately the re- sources of such funds." This rider is invalid because it seeks to change the general laws on deposit of public moneys in the treasury without amending such statutes. 27. Page IV-2 for Central Education Agency which reads, "The Texas Central Education Agency is authorized to employ personnel in Agency Administration only in the line- item positions listed above and in those positions listed in the 'Schedule of Classified Positions, Agency Administration,' below. It is provided, however, that in the event of expansion of Federal programs or inauguration of new State-Federal prog- rams the State's responsibility for which lies with the Central Education Agency, additional positions in excess of the number limitations in the 'Schedule of Classified Positions, Agency Administration' may be utilized, but only with the advance approval of the Governor." -5864- Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page 14 (M-1199) This rider is invalid to the extent that the Governor's approval is required, and the balance of the rider is valid. 28. Page IV-13 for School for the Blind and School for the Deaf which reads, "However, such recommended salary rates in excess of the min- imum amounts specified in said Senate Bill No. 116, as amended, and the salaries of coaches and teachers of exceptional children, may not be paid without the advance written approval of the Governor: but such approved rates shall never exceed the rates of pay for like posi- tions paid in the Austin public schools." This rider is invalid to the extent of requiring the Gov- ernor's approval, and the balance of the rider is valid. 29 . Page IV-26 for the University of Texas at Austin which reads, "None,of the funds approp- riated above to the University of Texas at Austin for the item 'Labor and Management Education and Research' may be expended until a committee is appointed by the President of the University of Texas at Austin to adminis- ter this program. This committee shall be composed of persons who represent either management or labor and the representation on this committee shall be equal between labor and management leaders from the State. The appointment of these members shall be approved by the Governor. The committee shall appoint a director who must be ap- proved by both labor and management through their representatives on this committee." This rider is invalid because it amounts to general legis- lation in the Appropriation Act. 30. Page IV-72 for Texas State Technical Insti- tute which reads, "None of the funds ap- propriated above to the Texas State Techni- cal Institute may be expended without the prior approval of an annual operating budget by the Governor; provided, however, copies of such requests for the Governor's action thereon, shall be filed with the Legislative Budget Board." -5865- Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page 15. (M-1199) This rider is invalid, C-441. 31. Page IV-72 for Texas State Technical Insti- tute which reads, "Any architectural fees paid from funds appropriated hereinabove shall have the prior written approval of the Gover- nor." This rider is invalid, M-280 and M-280-A. 32. Page IV-73 for Texas State Technical Insti- tute which reads, "None of the funds appro- priated hereinabove to Texas State Technical Institute may be expended for maintenance and operation of any aircraft without the prior written approval of the Governor." This rider is invalid. See M-280, M-280A, and M-1141. 33. Page IV-al, Section 37, Special Provisions Relating to State Agencies of Higher Educa- tion which reads, "PRESIDENTS' HOMES. No funds appropriated by this Act may be used for the purpose of constructing a home for a president of any of the general academic teaching institutions named herein, without obtaining the approval of the Governor prior to obligating any funds for this purpose; provided, however, that copies of such requests for the Governor's approval, and notice of the Governor's action on such requests, shall be filed with the Legislative Budget Board." This rider is invalid because it constitutes general legislation. See M-280, 280-A, and M-1141. 34. Page IV-al, Section 38, Special Provisions Relating to State Agencies of Higher Educa- tion which reads, "BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. Prior to the allocation, expenditure or en- cumbrance of any funds appropriated by this Act, including funds provided through Article VII, Sections 17 and 18, of the State Con- stitution, for individual building construc- tion projects costing in excess of twenty- five thousand dollars ($25,000), other than -5866- Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page 16. (M-1199) classroom library and laboratory building projects, the planned expenditure of such funds shall be approved by the Governor: provided, however, that copies of such re- quests for the Governor's approval, and notice of the Governor's action on such re- quests, shall be filed with the Legislative Budget Board." This rider is invalid insofar as the Governor's approval is required. While the Legislature can require information filinq with the Governor and with the Legislative Budget Board; the requirement of the Governor's-approval is invalid. See N-280, 280-A, and M-1141. 35. Page IV-82, Section 43, Special Provisions Relating to State Agencies of Higher Educa- tion which reads, "SALARY REPORTING. None of the funds appropriated to institutions of higher education by this Act shall be expended for payment of salary to any person whose sala- ry is being supplemented from other than ap- propriated funds until a report showing the amount of salary being paid from other sources has been reported to the Secretary of State." This rider is valid and is a simple condition which the Legislature has the power to impose in an Appropriation Act. 36. Page V-28 Salary Provisions which reads, "An employee whose classified position is re- allocated by this Act to a higher salary group shall receive the step 1 rate in the higher salary group or the rate which he would have received had his classified position not been reallocated, whichever rate is higher. Provided, however, an employee whose classified position is reallocated by this Act to a higher salary group, may have his salary adjusted not more than two steps higher than otherwise provided by this section. Such additional adjustment shall be for the purpose of main- taining desirable salary relationships among employees in the affected positions, and shall have the prior approval of the Legislative Audit Committee." -5867- . Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page 17 (M-1199) This rider is invalid insofar as requiring approval of the Legislative Audit Committee. Article 6252-11 contains the general law on the subject of classified salary positions and to the extent that the rider is not in conflict there- with, it is otherwise valid. 37. Page V-42, Section 15, Subsection b., Travel Regulations, which reads, "Employees of the Governor's office and employees of other State agencies designated by the Governor to repre- sent him at govermental meetings or conferences when held out of the State shall receive actual meal, lodging, and incidental expenses. State offi- cials and employees who travel to rep- resent the Governor at governmental meetings or conferences may be reim- bursed for their expenses out of ap- propriations made to the agencies by which they are employed." This rider is valid because it is a reasonable direction as to the use of appropriated funds. 38. Page V-43, Section 18, Subsection a., Travel Regulations, which reads, "PASSENGER VEHICLES. None of the moneys appropriated in this Act may be expended for the purchase, mainte- nance or operation of a passenger car or of airplanes designed for passenger transportation unless authority to do so is stated by the language of this Act. Where such authority is stated, the purchase of an airplane, or the repair of an airplane, the cost of which is in excess of five thousand dollars ($5,0001, in any one fiscal year shall have the prior written ap- proval of the Governor, and notice of such approval shall be filed with the Legislative Budget Board." This rider is invalid only to the extent of the require- ment of the Governor's approval. Opinion M-999 isoverruled to that extent. -5868- Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page 18 (M-1199) 39. Page V-44, Section 21, Other Provisions, which reads, "REPORTING APPEARANCES BEFORE FEDERAL AND STATE AGENCIES. The Governor's office may require agencies of the State of Texas appearing before Federal agencies or agencies of other states to submit in writing to the Governor the purpose of such meetings and expression of the policies of the State agency concerning the subject matter of the meeting. After reviewing the policies, the Governor may require the State agency to conform to the policies of the State of Texas as outlined by the Governor and the'Legislature before funds appropriated in this Act may be expended for necessary travel and other expenses connected with such appearances." This rider is invalid because it is general legislation in a state appropriation bill. 40. Page V-46, Section 32, Other Provisions, which reads, "AUDITS. None of the appropri- ations herein made shall be used to employ any firm or person to audit the books of any department, board, commission, institu- tion or State agency, this being the duty of the State Auditor; provided, however, that in any instances where the funds avail- able to said State Auditor are not, in his judgment, sufficient for any requested or contemplated audit, the department head or heads having authority to disburse the appropriations herein made are hereby auth- orized to direct the State Comptroller to transfer from any appropriations to the appropriation herein made for the State Auditor the amount which in the judgment of the State Auditor is necessary for the purpose of making such audit." This rider is a valid authorization in implementation of the general law and duty of the State Auditor. -5869- . Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page 19 (M-1199) 41. Page V-47, Section 38, O.ther Provisions, which reads, "TYPEWRITER, ADDING MACHINE AND CALCULATOR REPAIRS. Except for the State Highway Department and State Health Department which maintain their own type- writer repair service, all other agencies of the State with appropriations made in Ar- ticle I, Article III, and the Coordinating Board, Texas College and University System, and the Central Offices of the Board of Regents, State Senior Colleges in Article IV of this Act and having either electric or manual typewriters located in Austin, shall have them repaired and maintained by the Board of Control. The Board of Control shall purchase all necessary re- pair parts and be reimbursed by the agencies for only the repair parts used. None of : the funds appropriated in Articles I and III of this Act shall be expended for re- pair or maintenance service on typewriters located in Austin without the prior auth- orization of the Board of Control. The Board of Control shall establish such rules of procedure as will effect an orderly and efficient program for repair and maintenance of State-owned typewriters in Austin under the control of agencies in Articles I and III of this Act. "All agencies of the State located within the Capitol Complex Area shall have all state- owned adding machines and calculators repaired and maintained by the Board of Control. The Board of Control shall purchase all necessary parts and be reimbursed by the agencies for only the repair parts used. None of the funds appropriated for this purpose to State agencies located within the Capitol Complex Area shall be expended for repair and maintenance of State-owned adding machines and calculators without the prior authorization of the Board of Control. The State Board of Control shall establish such rules of procedures as will effect an orderly and efficient program for .-5870- Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page 20 (M-1199) repair and maintenance of State-owned adding machines and calculators in Austin under control of agencies located within the Capitol Complex Area. State agencies located outside the Capitol Complex Area in Austin may utilize this adding machine and calculator repair service through interagency contract with the Board of Control." This rider is invalid because it constitutes general legis- lation. Article 664-3, Vernon's Civil Statutes contains the general law. 42. Page V-48, Section 40, Other Provisions, which reads, "RENTED MACHINES AND EQUIPMENT. None of the moneys appropriated in this Act shall be used for the rental of any equipment which exceeds a rental cost of $1,000 per year (except for data processing equipment) with- out having the prior written approval of the Governor. Such approval shall be required before the request is processed by the Board of Control, and the State Comptroller or any localdisbursingofficer shall not issue warrants or checks in payment of equipment rentals without such prior approval. None of the moneys appropriated by this Act shall be paid to any seller who delivers any used or rented equipment in fulfillment of an order for new equipment, even though said equipment has been used by the agency placing the order. "It is further provided that none of the moneys appropriated by this Act may be ex- pended for the purchase or rental of electron- ic tabulating or data processing equipment without the advance written approval of the Governor therefor. It is the expressed in- tent of the Legislature that existing tabu- lating and data processing installations of the State Government shall be efficiently utilized through interagency agreements with State departments and agencies needing such services, prior to the expenditure of public ..5871- ’ . Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page 21 (M-1199) funds for separate and additional instal- lations of such equipment. Agencies re- questing approval of the Governor for purchase or rental of this type of equip- ment shall file a detailed report outlining steps taken to utilize existing equipment and reasons why such utiliiation is not feasible." This rider is invalid because it constitutes general legis- lation and also invalidly delegates to the Governor legislative duties and authority. 43. Pages V-51 and 52, Section 47, Other Provi- sions, which reads, "ATTORNEYS. From and after September 1, 1971, should a vacancy occur in any department or institution of higher learning, not otherwise exempted, in Articles III or IV of this Act in a position which has as its primary function the prac- tice of law and rendering of legal services and counsel, said position shall be filled only after having received the written ap- proval of the Attorney General. "None of the funds herein appropriated may be expended for legal services until the Attorney General has given prior written ap- proval for the employment of such personnel and the compensation to be paid. This pro- vision shall apply to all legal services ex- cept those rendered by personnel who are classified in the Position Classification Plan. "None of the funds appropriated in this Act may be expended for classified positions which function as hearings examiners unless the person filling such position has been licensed to practice law in the State of Texas. The Attorney General and State Classification Officer shall cooperate in carrying out the intent of this provision and shall report any violation to the Comp- troller of Public Accounts who shall with- hold any payments for the position in ques- tion until such violation has been corrected. Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page 22 (M-1199) Provided, however, that this provision shall not apply to such classified positions filled before the effective date of this Act. "None of the funds appropriated in Articles II, III and IV of this Act, with the excep- tion of funds appropriated to the Secretary of State, may be used for the delivery of a written legal opinion unless a copy of such opinion is furnished the Attorney General. "None of the funds appropriated in Articles II, III and IV of this Act, with the excep- tion of funds appropriated to the State Library and for State-supported law schools, may be expended for purchase of law books without the approval of the Attorney General." This rider is invalid because the subject matter involved constitutes general legislation. To the extent that this hold- ing conflicts with prior opinions, the same are hereby over- ruled to the extent of conflict. Those include C-449 (1965); C-485 (1965); C-782 (1966); M-249 (1968). 44. Page V-55, Section 59, Other Provisions, which reads, "It is also provided that, in the event of expansions of Federal programs, additional Federal funds becoming available may be used to carry out the expanded prog- rams, but only with the advance approval of the Gove,rnor; provided, however, that copies of such requests for the Governor's approval, and notice of the Governor's action on such requests, shall be filed with the Legislative Budget Board." This rider is invalid to the extent that it requires the approval of the Governor. 45. Page V-51, Section 45, Other Provision,s, which reads, "BUILDING ALTERATIONS PROHIBITED. None of the funds appropriated in this Act may be expended for removing walls, partitions or any other permanent parts of the first and -5873- Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page 23 (M-1199) second State Office buildings, the Supreme Court building, the Archives and Inusrance buildings, and the Finance building, ex- cept for such renovations that may be neces- sary for new offices or departments moving into such buildngs, unless otherwise auth- orized and provided for elsewhere in this Act, or upon the approval of the State Board of Control." This rider is invalid and constitutes general legislation. Article 665, Vernon's Civil Statutes, is the general law on this subject and provides authority for the Board of Control to repair buildings. The above opinion concerning the various rider provi- sions of the appropriation bill about which our advice was requested intentionally expresses no view on whether the sub- ject matter of the various riders might be validly enacted by some form of general legislation. It is our opinion that those riders discussed above which attempt to provide for an approval and an informational filing with the Budget Board express two distinct legislative intents, and that the second intent is severable from the first: how- ever, except where the item of appropriation is contingent upon the filing being made [for example, item 8 above, page 61 the language requiring the filing appears to us to be di- rectory and not mandatory. SUMMARY ------- Forty-'five riders contained in the 1971 General Appropriation Act are considered and passed upon as to validity. See this Opinion for specific riders. Prepared by Roger Tyler and John Reeves I Assistant Attorneys General -5874- Hon. Robert S. Calvert, page 24 (M-,1199) APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE Kerns Taylor, Chairman W. E. Allen, Co-Chairman J. C. Davis Harriet Burke Jack Sparks Roland Allen SAMUEL D. MCDANIEL Staff Legal Assistant ALFRED WALKER Executive Assistant NOLA WHITE First Assistant I -5875-