Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

3;. .C” - -* THE ATITOEWEY GENERAL OF 7rExAs June 7, 1962 Mr. R. L. Lattimore Opinion No. WW-135% Criminal District Attorney Hidalgo county Re: Whether the fact situation Edinburg, Texas presented comes within Arti- cle 432 Vernon's Penal Code, Dear Mr. Lattimore: concerning nepotism. You have requested an opinion from this office upon whether the provisions of Article 432, Vernon's Penal Code, are applicable to the following fact sutiation: "On May 4 1961 the Mercedes Independent School District and Che City of Mercedes entered into a contract for a joint taxing office. In the contract there is a clause which states that the Board of Trustees of the Mercedes Independent School District will have complete control over the employees of the joint tax office. Thereaf- ter, the Board of Trustees gave authority to the Tax Collector, who is also manager of the joint tax office, authority to hire additional person- nel for the tax office. "In July, 1961, the Tax Collector employed a woman as secretarial help, who it was subse- quently learned is a first cousin of one of the members of the Board of Trustees of the Mercedes Independent School District. Y'his woman's name was never presented to the Board for employment and the Board did not vote or confirm this appointment as such. The Mercedes Independent School District and the City of Merce- des share the bills of the joint tax office. The Board of Trustees does vote on the approval of their share of the bills of the joint tax office, a portion of which is the employee's salary." Article 432 provides in part that: "No officer of this State nor any officer of any district, county, city, .precinct, school dis- trict, or other municipal subdivision of this State . . . shall appoint, or vote for, or confirm the --- Mr. R. L. Lattimore, page 2 (W-13%) appointment to any office, position, clerkship, employment or duty, of any person related with- in the second degree by affinity or within the third degree by consanguinity to the person so appointing or so voting, or to any other member of any such board . . . of which such person so appointing or voting may be a member, when the salary, fees, or compensation of such appointee is to be paid for, directly or indirectly, out of or from public funds or fees of office of any kind or character whatsoever; . . .I' In addition Article 433, Vernon's Penal Code, provides that: "The inhibitions set forth in this law shall apply,,toand include . . . public school trustees, . . . The provisions of Articles 2780, 2791 and 2792, Ver- non's Civil Statutes, give to the Board of Trustees of an Inde- pendent School District broad discretionary powers as to the pub- lic schools within the district and to certain aspects of the assessment and collection of taxes for school purposes. In the instant case the Boar.dof Trustees has entered into a contract whereby a joint tax office will be operated by the independent school district and the City of Mercedes, and one of the conditions of such contract is that the Board of Trus- tees will have complete control over the employees of such joint tax office. While the Board of Trustees has delegated to the in- dividual acting as assessor and collector of taxes for the inde- pendent school district the authority to hire personnel for the operation of such office, such delegation of authority is a dis- cretionary act by the Board of Trustees and one which could be withdrawn or modified at any time. In the case of Aldine Indenendent SChool District v. Standlev, 1% Tex. 547, 280 S.W.2d 578 (19551,the Court stated that: "We think it apparent from a reading of the above statutes, that an assessor-collector of taxes appointed by a school board is not only not of ecual power and privileges with the trustees; but, on the Contrary, is Only an asent or emclovee of such school board at its discretion. . . .*I (Emphasis added). Mr. R. L. Lattimore, page 3 (m/-13%) In Attorney General's Opinion No. O-4686 (1942) this office had before it the question of whether the employment of a brother of a member of the Commissioners' Court by the Sheriff was in violation of Article 432. The Commissioners' Court had or was considering the passage of an order delegating to the Sheriff the authority to employ the various courthouse employees. While Attorney General's Opinion NO. O-4686 (1942) recognized that the Commissioners1 Court could delegate such authority it further held that: "If the Commissioners' Court through the sher- iff as its agent employed a brother of one of the county commissioners as a janitor or other court- house employee, such employment would be a direct and flagrant violation of Article 432, V.A.T.P.C." Under the facts presented in the instant situation, we are of the opinion that the employment of an individual who is a first cousin of a member of the Board of Trustees of che Merce- des Independent School District, as secretarial help in the joint tax office of the Mercedes Independent School District and the City of Mercedes, would be in violation of Article 432. The neces- sary elements to constitute a violation of Article 432 are all present. The secretary employed to work in the joint tax office is related to a member of the Board of Trustees within the prohib- ited degree; the employment of the secretary related to the member of the Board of Trustees will necessitate a portion of her compen- sation being paid from the public funds of the Mercedes Independ- ent School District; and while the Board of Trustees of the Merce- des Independent School District have not actually appointed, voted for, or confirmed such employment by virtue of delegating this authority to another, this will not prevent there being a viola- tion of Article 432 in view of the holding in Attorney General's Opinion No. 0-4686 (1942). SUMMARY Under the facts presented, the employment of a secretary by the joint tax office of the Mercedes Independent School District and the City of Mercedes who is a first cousin of a member of the Board of Trustees of the Mercedes Independent School District -. _. Mr. R. L. Lattimore, page 4 (WW-13%) -would result in a violation of Article 432, Vernon's Penal Code. Yours very truly, WILL WILSON Attorney General of Texas PB:wb Assistant APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE W. V. Geppert, Chairman Robert Patterson Coleman Gay W. 0. Shultz REVIEWED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: Leonard Passmore