Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

L. THEATTORNEYGENERAL OFTEXAS W’IIA. WIILSON ATTORNEYGENERAL March 9, 1962 Ronorable Jesse James Opinion No. WW-1271 State Treasurer State Treasurer’s Office Re: Whether, under the provisions Austin, Texas of Section 3 of House Bill No. 1, Acts 57th Legislature, 3rd C.S. (The Escheat Law), the first advertisements required therein should be Bear Mr. James: in May, 1962 or May, 1963. You have asked whether, under the provisions of Sec- tion 3 of House Bill No. 1, Acts 57th Legislature, 3rd Called Session, 1962 (codified in Vernon’s Civil Statutes of Texas aa Article 3272b), the first advertisements required therein ehould be in May, 1962 or May, 1963? In your request it Is indicated that this Inquiry is prompted by the fact that the subject Act will become effective on May 3, 1962, and the further fact that Section 3 of the Act In its relevant parts, provides: “Section 3. Advertising for Owners. “When, on or after the effective date of this Article,. dormant deposits or Inactive accounts have remained in such condition for more than seven (7) years, and the depository does not know the where; abouts of the deoositors or any owners thereof. the depository, during the fir& month of May fol- lowing the seven (7)year period, shall cause to be published once in a newspaper, published In the city or county in which the depository Is located, a notice entitled ‘Notice of the names of persona appearing asthe owners of unclaimed amounts held by (name and address of depository) which shall list the names, in alphabetical order, and the last known address, If any, of such missing depositors, but not the amounts of such deposits. Newspapers eligible for such publications shall be those de- fined in Section 2 of Article 28a, Revised Civil Statutes of Texas, 1925, as amended, and If no such newspaper Is published in the county of a deposi: tory, publication shall be made In a newspaper published in Bn adjoining county. Honorable Jesse Jemes, page 2 (W-1271~) “Annually thereafter during the Month of May of each year the depository shall bll h i -manner the names of such depo%aP~r ciedin tars whose deposits or accounts have not been reported and delivered to the State in accordance with Section 4 hereof, if the whereabouts of any owner thereof still remains unknown to the deposl- tory and their deposits or account8 still remain in a dormant or inactive status as herein defined.” (Raphasls supplied) Technically speaking, it might be said that there will be no “month of May” in 1962 after the effective date of the Act in the aenae that fewer than the thirty-one days al- lotted to May by the calendar will occur after the effective date, of the Act. It is to be noted, however, that the Legislature did not say, “during, the first full month of May”, although’ the Legislature could have eaaimo said if it had been the legialatlve intention to delay the first advertisements to such time a8 a full month of May occurs. Moreover, the foregoing roviaions are to be viewed in light of the fact that Section fl of the Act requires the depository to submit a report to the State Treasurer “on or before @y 1st of the year following the first publication.” It is thus aeen in this same Act that the Legislature was dia- posed to use the date “May 1” where intended. From this It seems likely that the Legislature would have required the ad- vertisements to be made during the month beginning on the first May 1st following the seven (7) year period” if It had been the intention of the Legislature to not require advertise- ments until the first full month of May after the effective date of the Act. One of the fundamental rules of statutory conatruc- tion is the rule that Words In common use, when contained in a statute, will be read according to their natural, ordinary, and popular meaning, unless a Contrary intention is clearly apparent from the context. 39 Tex.Jur. 198, 199, Statutes, Sec. 105. The phrase ‘“the month of May” often denotes a point in time without reference to the extent of the period Involved. The elapse of one or more days of the month does not destroy the identity of the remaining days as “the month 0r ~a~r.1’ If, :in common parlance, a person askia, for example, between the third day of May and the first day of June: ‘+What month is this?“, the reply would be: “It is the month of May.” Honorable Jesse James, page 3 (WW-1271) In other words, the "month of May" is ordinarily considered as existing until all the days of the month have elapsed. We find nothing in the Act which would authorize a departure from the ordinary and commonly accepted meaning which attaches to these words. This is the sense In which the Legislature, In our opinion, intended to use the phrase "the first month of May." In this sense, the first time the month of May will be . In existence after this Act becomes effective will be May of 1962. Accordingly, it is our opinion that the Legislature meant for the advertisements to be made in May of 1962. SUMMARY Under the provisions of Section 3 of Article 327213, Vernon(s Civil Statutes, the first adver- tlsements required therein are to be made in May or 1962. Very truly yours, WILL WILSON Attorney Qeneral of Texas 3J I- 6. By #enry G; Bras Assistant HGB:dhd APPROVED: OPINIONCOMMITTEE W. V. Ge,ppert, Chairman Jack Price William E, Allen Coleman Gay Pat Bailey REVIEWEDFOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: Houghton Brownlee, Jr.