Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

ORNEY GENERAL OFTEXAS March 1, 1962 Honorable Mack Wallace County Attorney Opinion No. WW-1267 Henderson County Athens, Texas Re: Whether the Commissioners' Court is authorized to pay for the removal and re- building of barns and other buildings out of the Special Road and Dear Mr. Wallace: Bridge Fund. In your letter requesting an opinion from this office you submit certain facts as follows: "The City of Athens proposes to trade a piece of land owned by them for a piece of land owned by the county. Incident to this trade the county will of necessity have to spend in the neighborhood of $14,000.00 rebuilding its barns which are located on the present county !.and. The Commissioners' Court proposes to pay for the removal of these barns and other buildings by spending money out of the Special Road and Bridge Fund." (timphasisadded) Also, during a telephone conversation with this office on January 29, 1962, you stated that the barns and other buildings, presently located on county owned land, are utilized to provide housing for county road trucks, machinery and equipment. In addition you stated that the voters of Henderson County have authorized a 15 cent tax, as is provided for by Section 9, Article VIII of the Texas Constitution, thereby creating a Special Road and Bridge Fund. With regard to the foregoing circumstances you ask a question which Is substantially as follows: Whether the Commissioners* Court of Henderson County is authorized to pay for the removal and rebuilding of barns and other buildings out of the Special Road and Honorable Mack Wallace, page 2 (~-1267) Bridge Fund. Our discussion herein will be limited to the legality of the proposed expenditure of money out of the Special Road and Bridge Fund for the purposes mentioned above. Article 2351, Vernon's Civil Statutes, lists certain powers and duties of a Commissioners' Court with regard to establishing and maintaining public roads and bridges. Those provisions most pertinent to our discussion are as follows: "Each commissioners' court shall: 8, . . . "3. Lay out and establish, change and discontinue public roads and highways. "4. Build bridges and keep them In repair. "5. Appoint road overseers and apportion hands, "6. Exercise general control over all roads, highways, ferries and bridges in their counties. ,I . . . "15. Said Court shall have all such other powers and jurisdiction and shall perform all such other duties, as are now or may hereafter be prescribed by law." The voters of the County have enabled the Commls- sioners' Court to better perform the duties specified above. by authorizing the 15 cent tax as is provided for by Section 9 of Article VIII of the Texas Constitution. This created a Special Road and Bridge,Fund, as provided by the Cons- titution, thus making it a Constitutional Fund. Carrol v. Williams, 109 Tex. 155, 202 S.W. 504 (1918). First State Bank and Trust Compan of Rio Grande City v. Starr County, 306 s w 2d 24b (Civ.:pp., 19371. This Provision of the Const;t;tion &ads as follows: "Sec. 9 The State tax on property, exluusive of the tax necessary to pay the public debt, and . . Honorable Mack Wallace, page 3 (~~-1267) of the taxes provided for the benefit of the public free schools, shall never exceed Thrity- five Cents (354) on the One Hundred Dollars ($100) valuation; and no county, city or town shall levy a tax rate in excess of Eighty Cents (80#) on the One Hundred Dollars ($100) val- uation in any one (1) year for general fund, permanent improvement fund, road and bridge fund and jury fund purposes; provided further that at the time the Commissioners* Court meets to levy the annual tax rate for each county it shall levy whatever tax rate may be needed for the four (4) constitutional purpose?; namely general fund, permanent improvement fund, road and bridge fund and jury fund so long as the Court does not impair any out- standing bonds or other obligations and so long as the total of the fore oin tax levies does not exceed Elght$ Cents $80$7 on the One Hundred Dollars ( 100) valuation in any one (1) year. Once the Court has levied the annual tax rate, the ~same shall remain in force and effect during that taxable year; and the Legislature may also authorize an additional annual ad valorem tax to be levied and collected for the further maintenance of the maintenance of the"p;blic roads and high- ways, without the local notice required for special or local laws. This Section shall not be construed as a limitation of powers delegated to counties, cities or towns by any other Section or Sections of this Con- stitution." (Emphasis added) The Court in Carroll v.,Williams, supra, inter- preted Section 9 of Article VIII as follows: "Going to the real gist of the main issue before us, section 9 of article 8 Honorable Mack Wallace, page 4 (w-1267) of our Constitution, supra, inhibits any and all transfers of tax money from one to another of the several classes of funds therein authorized, and, as a sequence, the expenditure, for one purpose therein defined, of tax money raised ostensibly for another such purpose. The Immediate purpose In so prescribing a separate maximum tax rate for each of the classes of purposes there enumerated is, no doubt, to limit, accordingly, the amount of taxes which may be raised from the people, by taxation, declaredly for those several purposes or classes of purposes, respectively. But that Is not all. The ultimate and practical and obvious design and purpose and legal effect is to inhibit excessive expenditure for any such purpose or class of purposes. BJ necessary implication said provisions of section 9 of article tlwere designed, not merely to limit the tax rate for certain therein designed purposes, but to require ht y and all money raised by taxation fo: a:! such purpose shall be applied, faithfully, to that particular purpose, as needed therefor, and not to any other purpose or use whatsoever. Those constitutional nrovisXons control not‘onls the raising. but also the application, of ail such funds: and such is the legal effect of articles 2242 and 7357{, supra, when properly construed and applied, (Emphasis added) (Article 2242, above cited by the court, Is now Article 2352, Vernon's Civil Statutes, and Article 7357 is now Article 7048, Vernon's Civil Statutes), In Attorney General's Opinion No. O-298 (1939), this office held that the Commissloners~ Court of McLennan County had the authority to construct and pay for a county garage for housing, maintaining, repairing and servicing county road equipment, out of the County Road Bond Fund. The authorities relied on In said opinion hold in effect that the phrase "maintenance of the public roads" as used in Section 9, Article 8 of the Constitution has a broad enough meaning to Include the doing of everything necessarily and appropriately connected with and Incidental to the laying out, opening and construction of public roads and the maintenance of an efficient road system. The opinion accordingly reasons that since the Commissioners' . . Honorable Mack Wallace, page 5 (WW-1267) Court is authorized to acquire machinery and equipment for the maintenance and repair of public roads, it necessarily follows that the Commissionersl Court is authorized to properly house, service and repair such equipment, and pay for same out of the County Road Bond Fund. The same principles are equally applicable here. It would be illogical to authorize or permit the purchase of maintenance equipment out of a road maintenance fund and not authorize the purchase of facilities necessam to house and/or service such equipment out of the same fund. By the same token, if the garage facilities become obsolete or unsuitable for the purposes intended, it would be illogical to prohibit expenditure of that same fund for renovation, relocation or construction of additional facilities if circumstances require it. If in the discretion of the Commissioners' Court, the existing location of garage or storage facilities are unsuitable, and in the judgment 01' the Commissioners' Court the proposed relocation will permit more efficient utilization and operation of the maintenance equipment, then the expense in relocating the existing structures or building additional structures to house the county road trucks and equipment on the new location, is directly related to the function of establishing and maintaining roads and bridges in the County, On the basis of the authorities discussed, it is our opinion that the Commissionerat Court Is authorized to use the Special Road and Bridge Fund for such a necessary attribute of the public road system as adequate and suitable storage or service facilities for the county road trucks and maintenance equipment. SUMMARY The Commissioners* Court of Henderson County is authorized to pay out of the Special Road and Bridge Fund for the removal and relocation of county "barns" and other buildings, which structures are utilized to house and service county road trucks and maintenance equipment, if the court finds that the present location is unsuitable. Very truly yours, WILL WILSON Attorney General of Texas . ,. Honorable Mack Wallace, page 6 (~~-1267) 1RW:mkh APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE W, V. Geppert, Chairman Arthur Sandlin Morgan Nesbltt Grundy Williams Coleman Gay REY'IEWEDFOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: Houghton Brownlee, Jr,