Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

E TTORNEY GENERAI. Aas- 11.I’EXAS June 24, 1960 Honorable Russell D. Austin County Attorney Andrews County Andrews, Texas Opinion No. WW-864 Re: Office of County Clerk and District Clerk becoming separated in view of increase in population over a,000 in- habitants according to the Dear Mr. Austin: 1960 Federal Census. You have requested an opinion on the following questions: "1. When do the offices of County Clerk and District Clerk become automatically separated in Andrews County in view of the increase in the popu- lation as above stated? "2. If the present joint County Clerk and Dis- trict Clerk desires to become the District Clerk and the local democratic committee is willing to place his name upon the ballot as the democratic nominee for the coming general election, can that be done by said local democratic committee at the September meeting of said local democratic com- mittee? “3. If the present joint County Clerk and Dls- trict Clerk desires for his name to be placed upon the ballot as the democratic nominee on the ballot for the general election in November, can the duly authorized local democratic convention in September also place upon the ballot a named candidate for the office of County Clerk to appear as the democratic nominee In the November general election? 1, 4. In the event that question three has been answered in the negative, can the Andrews Commission- ers Court appoint a County Clerk to serve to the end of the present County Clerk's term, December 31, 1962? Honorable Russell D. Austin, page 2 (WW-864) “5. If separation of the joint office of County Clerk and District Clerk is automatically separated on account of the census report of Andrews County, would the person now the duly elected County Clerk and District Clerk have the choice of determin- ing which of the offices of County Clerk or District Clerk he would choose to hold for the remainder of his elected term by reason of his having been elect- ed to said office in the election of 1958?" These questions are asked on the assumption of facts stated In your request as follows: "Prior to the 1960 Census, the population of Andrews County was less than 8,000. The preliminary reports and publications in surrounding newspapers as well as the local paper have given the population for the City of Andrews as well over 11,000, and the population for the County of Andrewa as over 13,000. When the County Clerk was elected in 1958, the office was the joint office of District and County Clerk. No one had his name on the ticket for County Clerk or for District Clerk In the Democratic Primary held here this year, nor did the local democratic convention noml- nate anyone to be placea upon the ballot for the general election in November of 1960. , . ." Section 9 of Article V of the Constitution of Texas, pro- vides as follows: "There shall be a Clerk for the District Court of each county, who shall be elected by the quali- fied voters for State snd county officers, and who shall,hold his office forkfour years, subject to removal by information, or by indictment of a grand jury, and conviction of a petit jury. In case of vacancy, the Judge of the District Court shall have the power to appoint a Clerk, who shall hold until the office can be filled by election. As amended Nov. 2, 1954." Section 20 of Article V of the Constitution of Texaspro- vides as follows: "There shall be elected for each county, by the qualified voters, a County Clerk, who shall hold,his Honorable Russell D. Austin, page 3 (W-864) office for four years, who shall be clerk of the County and Commissioners Courts and recorder of the county, whose duties, perquisites and fees of office shall be prescribed by the Legislature, and a vacancy In whose office shall be filled by the Commissioners Court, until the next general election; provided that In counties having a population of less than 8,000 persons there may be an election of a single Clerk, who shall per- form the duties of District and County Clerks. As amended Nov. 2, 1954." In Attorney General's Opinion WW-851 (1960) on a simi- lar question involving the office of sheriff and the office of assessor-collector of taxes, it was held that where a county had a population of more than 10,000 according to the 1950 Federal Census, and having a population of less than 10,000 according to the 1960 Federal Census- the assessor- collector of taxes for such county remains the assessor- collector of taxes for such county until the expiration of his term of office. This conclusion was based u on the holding in Attorney General's Opinion 2249 (1920'5 , that such offices were not intended to be separated or combined as the case may be, as of the date of such census, but were intended to be and should be separated or combined, as the case may be, as of the date of the termination of the term of office to which the incumbent was elected. It is noted that ,theprovisions of Section 20 of Article V of the Constitution of Texas, as amended in 1954, provides that in counties having a population of less than 8,000 persons there may be an election of a single clerk. The next elec- tion for this office will not occur until November 1962. On that date counties having a population in excess of 8,000 inhabitants will not be authorized to elect a single clerk, but must elect Individuals to hold the separate offices of district clerk and of county clerk. In view of the foregoing, and under the facts submitted, your.questions are answered as follows: The offices of county clerk and district clerk in Andrews County become separated as of January 1, 1963. SUMMARY Where a county had a population of less than 8,000 Inhabitants, according to the 1950 . i Honorable Russell D. Austin, page 4 (WW-864) Federal Census, and has a population of more than 8,000 inhabitants, accordinp to the 1960 Federal Cens&s, ~the~comblned of- fice of a single clerk who shall perform the duties of the district and county clerk do not become separated until the expira- tion of the term of office to which the incumbent was elected, January 1, 1963. Yours very truly, WILL WILSON Attorney General of Texas (yg&,T% John Reeves JR:ms Assistant Attorney General APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE J. C. Davis, Chairman Henry 0. Braswell Marietta Payne H. Grady Chandler Ralph~R. Rash Byron Fullerton REVIEWED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: Leonard Passmore