Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

. June 27'. 1958 Mr. Tom Blackwell Opinion No. WW-469 County Attorney Travis County Re: Duty of County Judge Austin, Texas who has received le- gally sufficient pe- tition for school bond election in a eommn school district,~ and .,, prior to his action ' thereon and six days later receives a second petition for election in the same district on a different amount .of,' Dear Mr. Blackwell: bonds. Your request for opinion states: "FACTSr On May 22, 1958, a peti- tion signed by the requisite number of voters in a common school district was presented to the County Judge re- questing an election for the issuance of bonds in the amount of $30,000.00. On May 26, 1958, and prior to any ac- tion being taken by the County Judge a second petition properly signed was presented to the County Judge request- ing an election for the issuance of bonds in the amount of $lE,OOO.OO in the same commn school district. "QUESTION: Under the provisions of Article 2785 of the Texas Revised Civil Statutes as amended, what action should the County Judge take." Mr. Tom Blackwell, page #2 (WW-469) We interpret your request to mean (ana we proceed on this assumption) that a legally sufficient petition was duly presented to =a accepted by the County Judge on May 22, 1958. We answer your inquiry as follows: Your County Judge should, within a reasonable time, call the election ,, requested in the first petition which was presented to him on May 22, 1958. : His jurisdiction and responsibility to act on this first petition attached at the moment it was presented to and accepted by him. A reasonable time is properly allowed for his investigation and determination as to the complete legal sufficiency of the petition before an election is called. The right of the people to vote on the propositions contained in the first petition having been first lawfully invoked, may not be interfered with nor defeated by~~the,fil- ing of the second petition. Article 2785: Wichita Common School Dist. No. 11 et al. v. Dickens Independents School Dist. of Dickens County et al., 206 S.WQ. 2a 885 (CiV.App. 1947, error ref.): Garrett, County Judge, et al. v. Unity Common School Dist. et al., 211 S.W. 2d 238 (Civ.App. 1948, error ref. n.r.e.). SUMMARY A County Judge who receives a legally sufficient petition forschool bond election in a connoon school dis- trict and who prior to his action thereon and six days later receives a second petition for election in the same district on a different,amount of bonds, should within a reasonable ,’ - Mr. Tom Blackwell, page #3 (Ww-469) * time call the election requested in the first petition. Very truly yours, WILL WILSON Attorney General of Texas W. E. Allen Assistant WEA-s APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE Geo. P. Blackburn, Chairman L. P. Lollar J. Arthur sanalin Leonard Passmore REVIEWED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL By: W. V. Geppert