Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

OIRNEY OF TEXAS Honorable Robert S. Calvert Comptroller of Public Accounts Capitol Station Austin, Texas Opinion,NO, W-369 Re: Authority of the Comp- troller to issue warrant in payment of traveling expenses to a District Judge under Article 1620, Vernon's Civil Statutes, Dear Mr. Calvert: upon the facts submitted, We have received your letter of January 31, 1958, in which you request our opinl.onas to the,propriety of Issuing a reimbursement warrabt to a District Judge of a District composed of two or more counties to cover his travel expenses for a round trip to Austin, Texas, to con- fer with the Director of the Texas Department of Public Safety to secure an officer to wait upon the District Court of one of the counties In his District. Authority for payment of this District Judge's travel expenses is contained in Article 6820, Vernon's $1~11 Statutes, but is limited to those expenses incurred . . when engaged in the discharge of their official duties in any county in this State other than the county of their residence". (Emphasis ours) While public officers are, for some purposes, agents of the public and of the community which they represent, their duties and authority are defined and limited by law, and they have no general authority to bind the public. They possess only such powers as.~;are expressly conferred upon them by law, or which are necessarily implied there- from. 34 Tex. Jur. 440, 441, Public Officers, Section 67. Section 23, Article V, Constitution of Texas, estab- lishes the office of Sheriff in each county; and It Is well recognized that the Sheriff is available to wait upon the Honorable Robert S. Calvert, Page 2 (W-369) District Court and to nerform its administrative and minis- terial functions. (Beicher, et al v. Cassidy Brothers Livestock Commission Co., b2 S W 924, writ of error denied; Hartson, Sheriff, et al v. Lanieion, et al, 292 S.W. 648, writ of error refused; 38 Tex. Jur. 142 Sheriffs, Section 2). That the Legislature Intends the Sheriff to pro- vide such service to the District Court Is made clear by Article 3988, Vernon's Civil Statutes, directing payment to the Sheriff for such service. Since your letter states no facts which would bring the act within the limits of authority of the District Judge, and, thereforeA within the meaning of "discharge of their official duties as used in Article 6820, Vernon's Civil Statutes, we are of the opinion, and you are so ad- vised, that reimbursement for expenses so incurred is not authorized by such Article. SUMMARY Reimbursement of a District Judge's travel expenses in- curred in a trip to Austin for the purpose of securing an officer to wait upon the Court Is not authorized by Article 6820, Vernon's Civil Statutes, such trip not being in "discharge of their . Honorable Robert S. Calvert, Page 3 (W-369) official duties" upon the facts submitted. Yours very truly, WILL WILSON Attorney General of Texas Tom I. McFarling Assistant T1M:ws.m~ APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE Geo. P. Blackburn, Chairman Cecil C. Rotsch J. Mark McLaughlin J. Milton Richardson John H. Minton, Jr. REVIEWED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL BY: W. V. Geppert