Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Au6-n~ II. T~xka October 16, 1957 Honorable 0. B. Ellis Opinion No. WU-280 Direotor Department of Corrections Re: Legality of~making Huntsville, Texas payments after August 31, 1957, under the Eastham prison equip- ment contract let on Dear Sir: March 14, 1955. your request for an oplnlon dated September 18? 1957, relates to the legality of the issuance of a warrant to pay a claim against the appropriations contained in Acts 53rd Legislature, 1st Called Session, 1954, ch. 8,,Sec. 2, p. 21. An invoice for partial payment of the contractual obligation to the Southern Steel Company was returned on September 10, lg.57by the CTmptroller with a note stating: "I am returning the enclosed, voucher for the reason the account being incurred in February 1955 is now barred from payment bx a statute of limitation of this state. The question presented is whether or not this alaim on the 1954 appropriation is barred by Article 4357, Vernon's Civil Statutes, which reads in part: .No claim shall be paid from appropkitions unless presented to the Comptroller for payment within two (2) years from the close of the fiscal year for which such appropriations were made, but any claim not presented for payment within such period may be pre- sented to the Legislature as other claims for which no appropriations are avall- able. . . .' The close of the fiscal year following the 1954 appropriation was on August 31, 1954 thus claims against the original 1954 appropriation would normally be barred Honorable 0. B. Ellis, page 2 (WW-280) after A ust 31, 1956. However, the unexpended balance of Y appropriation was reappropriated by Acts 54th this 195 Legislature, 1955, ch. 519, p. 1199 and again reappropriated by Acts 55th Legislature, Regular Session, 1937, ch. 385, p. 1049. Your question Is thus narrowed to whather or not reappropriation of the unexpended balances for the'same purposes as prior appropriations extends the clalm,period .~ of Article 4357 for two years. In construing the pro- visions of Article 4 57 it Is stated in Attorney General's Opipion V-l416 (19523 : "The provision of Article 4357 here involved'Is a limitation statute, and it must be construed in the light of the object for its enactment. The purpose of~this provision was to elimi- nate a necessity for the Comptroller to I, carry stale appropriation accounts on his books in the likelihood,that there might be outstanding claims against them. It was not designed to affect the payment of claims against accounts which have been kept current by reappropriation. . . .' See also Attorney General's Opinion MS-lo: "This construction of Article 4357 was not intended to limit the fiscal years to the first year the appropriated funds were available, but is intended to apply to all fiscal years during which the appropriated funds are available for dis- bursement. . . ." We think it is clear, therefore, that the claim in question is not barred by Article 4357 because the un- expended balance has been kept current by reappropriation. It is our further opinion that Section 6 of Article VIII of the State Constitution would not be violated by the payment of the claim under consideration. The intention of the framers of Section 6, Article VIII was to allow the Legislature to re-examine every two years the disposition of unexpended balances of prior appropriations. This the Legislature has done by reappropriation. There is no appropriation of money for a longer term than two years. You are further advised that the reappropriation in 1957 extended the period for payment of claims of the Honorable 0. B. Ellis, page 3 (WW-280) Southern Steel Company until August 31, 1959. Article 4357, Vernon's Civil Statutes does not prevent payment after two fiscal years of claims from the unexpended bal- ance of a prior appropria- tion which has been kept current by reappropriation. Yours very truly, WILL WILSON Attorney General of Texas BY b-- Waco Stewart Assistant MS:wam APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTBB Geo . P. Blackburn, Chairman B. H. nmmins, Jr. John B. Webster W. V. Geppert REVIEWEDFOR TREATTORIKEYGENERAL BY: James N. Ludlum